ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on imported oil. Siduria recently implemented a program to convert heating systems from oil to natural gas. Siduria already produces more natural gas each year than it burns, and oil production in Sidurian oil fields is increasing at a steady pace. If these trends in fuel production and usage continue, therefore, Sidurian reliance on foreign sources for fuel should decline soon.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3919|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD6-Q4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-6 12:31:00 | 只看该作者

GWD6-Q4

GWD6-Q4:   assumption

In the past the country of Siduria has relied heavily on imported oil.  Siduria recently implemented a program to convert heating systems from oil to natural gas.  Siduria already produces more natural gas each year than it burns, and oil production in Sidurian oil fields is increasing at a steady pace.  If these trends in fuel production and usage continue, therefore, Sidurian reliance on foreign sources for fuel should decline soon.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

  1. In Siduria the rate of fuel consumption is rising no more quickly than the rate of fuel production.
  2. Domestic production of natural gas is rising faster than is domestic production of oil in Siduria.
  3. No fuel other than natural gas is expected to be used as a replacement for oil in Siduria.
  4. Buildings cannot be heated by solar energy rather than by oil or natural gas.
  5. All new homes that are being built will have natural-gas-burning heating systems.

为什么选A,不是已经说了Siduria already produces more natural gas each year than it burns,A算重复已知吗

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-7 11:56:00 | 只看该作者
顶顶
板凳
发表于 2009-9-7 22:52:00 | 只看该作者

A项说的是油的消耗量啊

原文只说了天然气(natural gas)的产量比使用量多,油田的产量 increasing at a steady pace

如果油的consumption比油田的产量增长的快,那么oil还是不够用,还要依赖外国啊。

A项没有重复

希望能帮到你~

地板
发表于 2010-2-21 15:11:58 | 只看该作者
A 说的是rate,不是实际的产量跟消耗量。
如果消耗量的基数大,就算 rate 小,实际增加的消耗量还是大。
5#
发表于 2010-5-10 23:27:13 | 只看该作者
LS的朋友 我觉得此处的rate是速度的意思 不是比例
要是比例的话那么基数分别是什么呢 而且这样反而解释不通了
要不你再想想 我觉得2楼的解释是比较合理的 呵呵
6#
发表于 2010-6-16 14:58:53 | 只看该作者
我觉得是这样的:因为前面只说了石油和天然气的消耗,但是结论是说整个燃料的消耗,中间有GAP,即所有燃料的消耗量必须与天然气和石油的特征一样才能有此结论---生产量大于消耗量.
7#
发表于 2010-7-18 20:35:49 | 只看该作者
关键点是不要被Siduria recently implemented a program to convert heating systems from oil to natural gas.这句话迷惑。。。
短期。长期?
如果nature gas的消耗量远远大于oil的话,oil就可忽略不计了。
还是觉得此题逻辑不是很严密。。个人观点
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 22:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部