[求助]新PREP 2 86 以前未讨论过

sophiacoming

86.        (24488-!-item-!-188;#058&000922) 
            

Junior biomedical researchers have long assumed that their hirings and promotions depend significantly on the amount of their published work.  People responsible for making hiring and promotion decisions in the biomedical research field, however, are influenced much more by the overall impact that a candidate's scientific publications have on his or her field than by the number of those publications.

The information above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of the following claims?

A. Even biomedical researchers who are just beginning their careers are expected already to have published articles of major significance to the field.

A. Even biomedical researchers who are just beginning their careers are expected already to have published articles of major significance to the field.

B. Contributions to the field of biomedical research are generally considered to be significant only if the work is published.

C. The potential scientific importance of not-yet-published work is sometimes taken into account in decisions regarding the hiring or promotion of biomedical researchers.

D. People responsible for hiring or promoting biomedical researchers can reasonably be expected to make a fair assessment of the overall impact of a candidate's publications on his or her field.

E. Biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion by fragmenting their research findings so that they are published in several journals instead of one.

 

答案是E。

 

我很困惑这道题的问题：The information above, if accurate, argues most strongly against which of the following claims?
                        

这句怎么理解啊？我把它当Flaw题来做了，所以i选了B……

这句怎么理解啊？我把它当Flaw题来做了，所以i选了B……

还有，我82和84题也有疑问，在原来旧帖后跟了，麻烦各位看到这个贴的时候顺便也去帮忙解答一下那两题……谢谢……

82：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=400721&star=1#3566978

82：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=400721&star=1#3566978

84：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=400722

这句怎么理解啊？我把它当Flaw题来做了，所以i选了B……

这句怎么理解啊？我把它当Flaw题来做了，所以i选了B……

还有，我82和84题也有疑问，在原来旧帖后跟了，麻烦各位看到这个贴的时候顺便也去帮忙解答一下那两题……谢谢……

82：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=400721&star=1#3566978

82：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=400721&star=1#3566978

84：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=400722

这句怎么理解啊？我把它当Flaw题来做了，所以i选了B……

这句怎么理解啊？我把它当Flaw题来做了，所以i选了B……

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/24 2:18:25编辑过]

sophiacoming

为什么我发帖子明明只打了一遍的话就会显示两遍啊，我要疯了，而且我怎么编辑都变得越来越重复@___@

大家将就着看吧，实在对不住……

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/24 2:21:06编辑过]

viviansecret

这道86题问题的含义是："以上信息如果是正确的，攻击了以下的哪个论述？"就是说，照着原文的原则和观点，以下选项中哪个是必错的。

jessiecg

我也不太懂这道题，我怎么觉得A,B,E都是错的？
哪个牛人再指点一下~

holygrail22

文章的逻辑线是发表的文章对某领域的影响>发表文章的数量。

E选项说研究人员把研究成果拆成好几份发表来增加升职几率。和逻辑主线相反

熊熊加小怪

被这个题目问法给整晕了。。。。

以后一定注意呀~~~

B是对的~~publish是必要条件

douniwan

E是对的  题目说 雇主应该看 申请者发表论文的总的影响力 而不是看发表论文的数量     问下面哪一项最反对这个说法
  E说申请者会把一篇论文 散开 发表到很多不同的期刊上   这样看就会增加此申请者的 总的影响力（因为他在很多权威期刊上都发表过论文），  所以如果看总影响力而不看  数量的话  是不合适的

怡然yiran

我还是没懂 为嘛E里面by fragmenting their research findings so that they are published in several journals instead of one表示的是发行数量上升。。。我理解的E里面动作的结果是impact变大呀，所以没有跟原文相反呀 呜呜呜

clover928

ASSUME:发表文章的数量与雇佣跟升职有关
HOWEVER：impact比数量更加决定雇佣跟升职

WEAKEN：E：Biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion by fragmenting their research findings
so that they are published in several journals instead of one.

weaken点应该是“事实上数量能决定”

答案就说明了这一点

448258130

clover928 发表于 2012-11-14 17:32
ASSUME:发表文章的数量与雇佣跟升职有关HOWEVER：impact比数量更加决定雇佣跟升职WEAKEN：E：Biomedical re ...

正解~~~~~~~