ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8700|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD26-Q22 好像没有讨论过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-4 10:28:00 | 只看该作者

GWD26-Q22 好像没有讨论过

GWD26-Q22

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion?

 

A.    A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.

B.    A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home

C.    The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.

D.   Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.

E.    Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.

请问这道题的逻辑思路是什么呢?? 我没大看懂 为什么选A呀

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-5 07:42:00 | 只看该作者

没人回答啊 顶一下、

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-5 21:46:00 | 只看该作者
郁闷啊 谁解答下啊 很困惑
地板
发表于 2009-8-6 10:34:00 | 只看该作者

A---explains the discrepancy in the question.

employees allergic > other population---it should be like this

but it's not in the question. why?

because once an employee get allergic, he will change his job, then in the report, he won't be in the total percentage. So the percentage reported is underestimated.

5#
发表于 2009-8-8 12:26:00 | 只看该作者

原来如此~~谢谢楼上解答:)

6#
发表于 2009-8-13 21:13:00 | 只看该作者

太谢谢了~~~

7#
发表于 2009-8-14 08:54:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用anistonlucky在2009/8/6 10:34:00的发言:

A---explains the discrepancy in the question.

employees allergic > other population---it should be like this

but it's not in the question. why?

because once an employee get allergic, he will change his job, then in the report, he won't be in the total percentage. So the percentage reported is underestimated.

C为什么不对,能帮忙解释一下吗?
8#
发表于 2009-8-14 22:23:00 | 只看该作者

我也想问下C为什么不对。。。

9#
发表于 2009-8-17 21:01:00 | 只看该作者

C恰恰和statement相悖了。Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

也就是说非动物园的管理者有animal-induced allergies 更多,超过了动物园员工的30%

10#
发表于 2009-10-27 22:36:00 | 只看该作者
我也选了C,选项的结构很难以理解啊~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 09:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部