OG 12 跪求 cr63

dujuan034

OG 12 == CR 63
    

when hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply,"No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissoiated from the part that replies.

which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

A why does the part that replies not answer ," yes"?

B why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

C why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?

D why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

E why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

看了答案还是晕.大家帮帮忙解答一下

hughlv

文中的argument是被催眠的自我被分为多个不相干的部分，其中一个接收到暗示认为自我是聋的，而其他部分不是。那个认为自我是聋的部分当然不会回答问题（因为聋的嘛当然认为自己是听不到问题的）。所以回答催眠师问题的是某一个其他部分，且没有被暗示为自我是聋的。

选项A作为Weaken还是蛮合适的，若回答问题的是另一个没被暗示为聋的部分，那他怎么会知道自我已经被暗示为聋的从而回答自己听不到问题呢？按题目中的理论应该是回答能听到才对。

孤独狂欢

既然被分为多个不相干的部分，那么理论上讲，他们可以回答 是 或者回答 不是，所以A就反问为什么不回答 是 呢？就反驳它只回答 不是

payo

以下是引用孤独狂欢在2009/8/2 22:47:00的发言：
既然被分为多个不相干的部分，那么理论上讲，他们可以回答 是 或者回答 不是，所以A就反问为什么不回答 是 呢？就反驳它只回答 不是

聋的部分是没有办法回答的 因为他听不见 所以不会有"no"的回答