请教费费135-73

isabellu

73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.
A 帮忙分析一下吧,彻底蒙了

fish_j

我也选B,但实在看不懂A


    

weiyu

NN们，快来看看

dansy

这题第一句是题干结论：科研结果在刊登之前不需要官方证实它的正确性。原因是，这些实验很多科学家会去重复做(replicate)。如果科研结果是错的，也没什么坏处，大家在重做时就能发现。 大意是这样。答案A说科学实验在被重做之前很多年都没人 去理它(unchallenged)。言下之意不好的科研结果科研长时间存在，应该会有不好的效应。

isabellu

太谢谢dansy了，终于明白了！！

elaine1031

up