|
以下是引用GMAT_onjob在2009/8/26 16:52:00的发言: OG 12 99. Which of the following most logically completes the argument? The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a signifi cant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since . (A) many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from foods’ having a longer shelf life (B) it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has (C) cooking is usually the fi nal step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods (D) certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is (E) for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded 开始选错了。应该选E。og解释。 situation 辐射杀死细菌但却降低了营养物质-如b1. 支持者想通过提出烹饪也会破坏b1含量,来打消对于辐射的顾虑。但这其实是误导。 因为, 要说支持者的论点是个误导,就要说出一些辐射食物的错。支持者说辐射杀死的b1并不比烹饪多,就暗示可以被烹饪的食物也可以被辐射,因为两种情况都会使得食物含有相同的b1. 但如果辐射和烹饪同时作用破坏的b1要比两种方法单独破坏的b1多,那么支持者的就构成了误导。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/26 18:27:10编辑过] |