ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1122|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助:大全-5-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-6-16 00:02:00 | 只看该作者

求助:大全-5-15


    

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands
suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if
private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the
national park system, which is now run by the government.


    

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility,
argues most strongly against the suggestion above?


    

A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural
resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members
and eventually take over their leadership.


    

B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to
achieve conservation objectives.


    

C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental
groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and general public.


    

D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for
control of certain park areas.
            
A


    E. Some endangered species,
such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the
private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by
insufficient resources.

    

逻辑简图:
Park system be in charge by private -> better
答案是A,可B为什么不对??
沙发
发表于 2009-6-16 14:05:00 | 只看该作者

请记住OG里面所说的逻辑题测试重点:选择最佳答案,而不是正确答案

B虽然也是against the suggestion的,但和A比较,A是更具说服力的

板凳
发表于 2009-6-18 23:42:00 | 只看该作者
  从阅读角度上来说,感觉B中的错误感觉是在best上,因为题干中未出现过最高级的表达法,呵呵,应该说是歪解吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-30 21:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部