|
2段 两个人的观点,第二个(地位有改变)驳斥第一个 V1 p1:中世纪以来欧洲妇女地位如何改变。结构清晰,第一句引出话题(有考题, 问你首句作用),先写一位女社会学家的看法被普遍认可,由于education啊,political的这些因素的影响,不论从经济上,社会地位上还是其它方面,从财产控制权等等之类来看中世纪妇女地位没有提高;在家庭和社会里仍然受压迫. p2:反对,有改变,然后就是另一个作家站出来霹雳啪啦的说不是这样,认为女性在宗教方面有了很多进步,发表了一些宗教的文章. 尽管妇女在经济和社会地位上还是其它方面没有明显改善,但是不容忽视的是他们得以self expression(有考题),这主要体现在其宗教信仰和其它一些方面(大概就是说他们能够有一些独立选择权得以做出自己的选择吧)。他们的religious 对他们的地位的提高有很大影响(有题问religious具体在哪方面有影响,选self-expression那个) 文章很短,大概 2/3屏幕吧,我的理解是作者并没有明显表明支持哪位arguer观点的态度。(可能会考到)
考题: 1. 有题问religious具体在哪方面有影响,选self-expression那个 2. 尽管妇女在经济和社会地位上还是其它方面没有明显改善,但是不容忽视的是他们得以self expression(有考题) 3. 第一句引出话题(有考题, 问你首句作用) 4. 我的理解是作者并没有明显表明支持哪位arguer观点的态度。(可能会考到) 5.
参考阅读 Historians who study European women of the Renaissance try to measure independence,” “options,” and other indicators of the degree to which the expression of women’s individuality was either permitted or suppressed. Influenced by Western individualism, these historians define a peculiar form of personhood: an innately bounded unit, autonomous and standing apart from both nature and society. An anthropologist, however, would contend that a person can be conceived in ways other than as an “individual.” In many societies a person’s identity is not intrinsically unique and self-contained but instead is defined within a complex web of social relationships. In her study of the fifteenth-century Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a historian who specializes in European women of the Renaissance attributes individual intention and authorship of actions to her subject. This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her sons, yet much of the historian’s own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as her own. Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist’s notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context. Indeed, one could argue that Alessandra did not distinguish her personhood from that of her sons. In Renaissance Europe the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed and did not necessarily coincide with the boundaries of the bodily self. |