ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: flutemama
打印 上一主题 下一主题

6月RC 机警汇集:共44篇 0626 12:48 update

[精华] [复制链接]
121#
发表于 2009-6-17 12:41:00 | 只看该作者

太感动了~楼主真是一个大好人~生病了都还坚持给大家整理JJ~愿楼主早日康复~善良的人一定会一切顺利的~谢谢~

122#
发表于 2009-6-17 19:38:00 | 只看该作者

6月RC 机警汇集:共32篇 0628 18:30 更新

我感觉我是不是穿越了

123#
发表于 2009-6-17 19:43:00 | 只看该作者

我靠,看到MM来整理,我心澎湃~

124#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-17 22:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用georgeche在2009-6-17 19:38:00的发言:

6月RC 机警汇集:共32篇 0628 18:30 更新

我感觉我是不是穿越了

我穿回来了~~~

125#
发表于 2009-6-18 06:13:00 | 只看该作者

15.advertisement 试验

V9 by lupisces第一段
     
讲了2个关于广告的effect的观点,一个是ads可以直接提高销售;一个是ads的影响是有等级的,或有顺序的(hierarchical);然后解释了后面那个观点;最后说之前的观点不好,提出了一个新理论E,这里有个in order to

这题我觉得跟competitive advertisement 是不一样的  我搜了一下找到了这个 

255 广告效果的研究    (但是看具体内容觉得不是)

V2另一篇讲广告的。第一段提出两个view,第一个view说广告是否有效要看对demand有没有影响,第二个view讲对demand有没有影响 又要看什么什么(不好意思,记不清了),第二段就第二个view提出了两种model做比较,traditional的和一个谁谁谁的。有考到这两种 model的比较,还有第一段中两种view的比较,也有主题题。

 

V3第一篇是讲advertisingeffect1P给出两个观点,不同学家对 advertising如何产生效果有不同的认识:一个认为advertising will be effective only if 它能对customerdemand stage产生影响;另一个认为对intermediate stage的影响同样会产生正面效果。2P是针对stagehierachical的划分进行详细描述。3道题,有主题题,我选了比较中性没有褒贬态度 的discuss...的那个选项;剩下的想不起来了.

反而在 143 competitive广告和noncompetitive广告的论述  找到了这个

 第一段首先讲了老观点,说广告的目的是什么sales的,新观点是广告其实是ms是指广告的effect 是hierarchy的(这个词很重要,题目后面都用了这个来代替新观点的说法);
第二段,说明了老观点忽略了什么,然后说了一个什么E的理论还是方法,就是为了说明新观点好的(这是考点,我的第一题就是问这个ms)

126#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 09:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用可乐_cola在2009-6-18 6:13:00的发言:

15.advertisement 试验

V9 by lupisces第一段
     
讲了2个关于广告的effect的观点,一个是ads可以直接提高销售;一个是ads的影响是有等级的,或有顺序的(hierarchical);然后解释了后面那个观点;最后说之前的观点不好,提出了一个新理论E,这里有个in order to

这题我觉得跟competitive advertisement 是不一样的  我搜了一下找到了这个 

255 广告效果的研究    (但是看具体内容觉得不是)

V2另一篇讲广告的。第一段提出两个view,第一个view说广告是否有效要看对demand有没有影响,第二个view讲对demand有没有影响 又要看什么什么(不好意思,记不清了),第二段就第二个view提出了两种model做比较,traditional的和一个谁谁谁的。有考到这两种 model的比较,还有第一段中两种view的比较,也有主题题。

V3第一篇是讲advertisingeffect1P给出两个观点,不同学家对 advertising如何产生效果有不同的认识:一个认为advertising will be effective only if 它能对customerdemand stage产生影响;另一个认为对intermediate stage的影响同样会产生正面效果。2P是针对stagehierachical的划分进行详细描述。3道题,有主题题,我选了比较中性没有褒贬态度 的discuss...的那个选项;剩下的想不起来了.

反而在 143 competitive广告和noncompetitive广告的论述  找到了这个

 第一段首先讲了老观点,说广告的目的是什么sales的,新观点是广告其实是ms是指广告的effect 是hierarchy的(这个词很重要,题目后面都用了这个来代替新观点的说法);
第二段,说明了老观点忽略了什么,然后说了一个什么E的理论还是方法,就是为了说明新观点好的(这是考点,我的第一题就是问这个ms)

我也看到了~~~这篇文章最好就是有新的版本 否则太乱了  女性阿 黑人阿  广告阿 都是长考的~~~有一大串看上去相似的题目 ~~头大阿

127#
发表于 2009-6-18 17:16:00 | 只看该作者

Flutemama:

gloria珊瑚这片原文你好像没收进去,我对了一下,好像是的

Chemicals used to disperse marine oil slicks may harm corals more than the off itself does, according to a new study. The finding suggests that chemical dispersants should be used near reefs only as a last resort, when oil approaches a shoreline where it might devastate wildlife and plants for decades.

In many cases, authorities first try to clean up oil spills mechanically. If weather conditions are too rough or a slick threatens to wash up on shore, dispersants are usually the next option. Made up of surfactants and solvents, dispersants act as detergents, breaking up oil into droplets that mix into water, scatter with currents, and eventually degrade. However, the dispersed oil droplets readily sink and can lethally contaminate coral.

Baruch Rinkevich of the National Institute of Oceanography in Haifa, Israel, and his colleagues tested whether chemical dispersants, as well as oil droplets, do harm to corals. They report that dispersants kill branching corals or retard their growth. The team also confirms previous research indicating that corals do better when exposed to oil that hasn't been dispersed.

"Dispersants are very toxic for corals; Rinkevich says. "It's a no-win situation, but more knowledge [will add to officials'] evaluation and decisions about what to do in unpredictable situations."

To test the effects of the dispersants, the researchers pruned 2-inch segments from the branches of two common hard coral species found in the Red Sea and grew them into several large colonies in laboratory tanks. The team then added to the tanks various concentrations of crude oil, one of six commercial dispersants mixed with oil, or one of the six dispersants alone. After allowing 24-hour exposure to the substances, researchers washed the corals, simulating what would happen in the real environment when oil and dispersants wash away. The team then measured coral survival and growth weekly for 50 days.After 1 week, more than 90 percent of one coral species and about 75 percent of the other survived in the oil-only tanks, whereas virtually all coral died in the tanks containing either the dispersant-oil mix or the dispersant alone. After 50 days, more than 90 percent of the surviving corals from the oil-only tanks continued to grow. Almost all coral from the dispersed-oil and the dispersant-only tanks experienced retarded growth.

Amy Merten, codirector of the Coastal
                Response
                Research
                Center at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Seattle, says that the results contradict the rule of thumb that dispersants are less toxic than oil droplets. It's important for authorities in charge of spill cleanups to note that coral reacts to the dispersant itself, she says. "There needs to be more consideration of dispersants." However, Merten adds that under real conditions, coral may not be exposed to dispersants in the same amount, and for the same duration, that it was in the laboratory tests.

                

128#
发表于 2009-6-18 18:57:00 | 只看该作者
上海小姑娘,好样滴
129#
发表于 2009-6-18 19:09:00 | 只看该作者

快考了

顶~~

130#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 21:43:00 | 只看该作者
今日更新完毕
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-22 18:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部