以下是引用snew27在2009-5-22 22:20:00的发言: 136:新增题 The following appeared in a memorandum from the information technology department of a major advertising firm: “The more efficient a firm’s employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. Improvements in a firm’s information technology hardware and software are a proven way to increase the efficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers. Therefore, if our firm invests in the most powerful and advanced information technology available, employee productivity will be maximized. This strategy ensures that every dollar spent on enhanced information technology will help to increase our firm’s profit margins.” Discuss how well reasoned . . .etc.
這題可以請大家幫我看看嗎~~找不太到地方攻擊呢!
1. Insufficient definition in the argument. Information technology has become the common tool in the office to be a useful assistant, better hardware and software can not conclude that the perfoemance must be improved due to tools are dependant on the people to manipulate. People are the main key to enable the operation of the system (hardware and software), not system itself. Take software engineer as an example: development tool can expedite the running perfroemce, but can not expedite engineer's brain
2. The working hour is defined from the government, to seek for the working smart will be worth than to seek for faster information technology. Working smart with better communication is the key to upgrade the performance in office
3. Keep pursuing the information technology would make the internal workflow instable since every new system would incorporate the new features or new functions, hence to do adjustment is necessary
4. Conclusion
|