[求助]请NN帮我理清一下这题的思路，混 乱！

vivi72

GWDTN24-10

Editorial:
        In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A.    The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

B.    Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

C.    People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

D.    The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.

E.     People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案是C

但在做题时，我一看到people who are employed，就觉得是无关选项排除了。

因为题目是在讲没有employed的人，权衡government assistance后，有没有可能去accept job。觉得C完全无关啊？不懂，很混乱，请高手赐教 。

jbyupei

C 基本上是个事实的暗示， 有了工作后再去换工作会得到HIGH PAYING，那么这些没有工作的人也愿意先拿个低PAYING的JOB，用来积攒跳槽的资本