[求助]gwd-TN13 Q2

秋日小菲

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashew were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government‘s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing plants and plastics

2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants

3. More people in kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them

4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices

5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in kernland off their land and into the cities

答案E，我选的是C

 

搜索到前人的解释是“The answer is E
If the samll farmers are driven into the cities, there will be more people compete jobs with urban workers. So the governemnt will not be able to reduce urban unemployment rate.”

 

可我觉得恰恰相反，farmer都跑到city, 应该加重失业率啊？！job不变，人却多了….这不是support吗？