这个题是不是有问题，选什么？

helenwolf

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.

2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.

3. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.

4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

fff777

E阿 题弄不明白没关系 关键是抓住结论，结论说去掉关税会让城里人失业，也就是说反对去关税

   只有E说村里人没利润了回去城里打工 那么成立就业人口不久又多了吗？ 政府

C说的总体 没说城乡 我觉得GWD最好的状态就是不是很明白作对了 因为临场很难1分钟想明白 感觉抓住中心词无关排除

helenwolf

我明白了，呵呵，lifted这里是去除的意思，在商业中指却掉某一个条款，谢谢！