State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate road system. Those people are mistaken, as is obvious from the fact that in each of the past six years, our state has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state. Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokesperson's argument?
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokesperson's argument? (A) In the spokesperson's state, spending on road improvements has been increasing more slowly over the past six years than it has in several other states. (B) Adequacy of a state's road system is generally less important to a businessperson considering doing business there than is the availability of qualified employees. (C) Over the past six years, numerous businesses have left the spokesperson's state, but about as many businesses have moved into the state. (D) In general, the number of miles of road in a state's road system depends on both the area and the population of the state. (E) Only states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts of money on road improvements. 。。
E一开始想选但觉得貌似太狠了,我想问D为什么不对,它这样是说路的数量要看人口和地区,那不是就说钱投的多不代表ADEQUATE吗~~算推理过渡吗~~~
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-31 15:36:03编辑过] |