以下是引用蓝色回忆在2009-4-24 13:50:00的发言:我是这么理解的 如果不看脸的人和看笑脸的人喝得一样活着更多 那为什么还要用笑脸去做广告呢?不如省下广告费~ 我记得其他几个选项都是无关 很好排除 请问蓝mm,这道题算"充分必要性" 还是"因果关系性",是不是如果能判断"充分必要性"就直接架桥,如果是"因果关系性" 就是排除他因,但有时很难区别题型? 有何办法啊, 比方说下面一题(出自FEIFEI) 9. Astronauts who experience weightlessness frequently get motion sickness. The astronauts see their own motion relative to passing objects, but while the astronauts are weightless their inner ears indicate that their bodies are not moving. The astronauts’ experience is best explained by the hypothesis that conflicting information received by the brain about the body’s motion causes motion sickness.
Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the hypothesis above?
A. During rough voyages ship passengers in cabins providing a view of the water are less likely to get motion sickness than are passengers in cabins providing no view. B. Many people who are experienced airplane passengers occasionally get motion sickness. C. Some automobile passengers whose inner ears indicate that they are moving and who have a clear view of the objects they are passing get motion sickness. D. People who have aisle seats in trains or airplanes are as likely to get motion sickness as are people who have window seats. E. Some astronauts do not get motion sickness even after being in orbit for several days. 答案:A 思路:搭桥法,建立A与B的联系。 |