ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2153|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD17-Q11: 感謝~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-22 11:15:00 | 只看该作者

GWD17-Q11: 感謝~


  •             
    11. GWD17-Q11:
                                

    

Some species of Arctic birds are
threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which
breed in the
Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for
hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if
and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to
official estimates.  Clearly, dropping
this restriction would allow the other species to
recover.


    


            

 


    


    

Which of the following, if true, most seriously
undermines the argument?


    


            

 


    


    
  1. Hunting limits for snow geese
    were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of
    snow geese.

            
  2. It has been many years since the
    restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than
    the scheduled date.

            
  3. The number of snow geese taken by
    hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

            
  4. As their population has
    increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used
    for several seasons.

    

E.   In the snow goose’s
winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.


                            

 ANS:B   
看過很多帖子的解答~~~大概能了解~B就是強調restriction沒有發揮功效~!


                                    

                 不過~~不懂restriction
是指什麼意思??  若是指5%的禁令~所以代表不用有restriction ~
 
                                                

                                            

                                        

                                    


    


            

                       就可以很快達到5%嗎??         還是指hunting season的 期間長短?   


                                    


                                            

                   感謝指點~~!!


                                    


                                    


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-22 11:17:28编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-4-27 12:50:00 | 只看该作者

B的意思是已经有很多年打猎季节没有因为这个禁令而提前结束了,近几年打猎季节都是按照一个规定的时间结束的,这个规定的时间跟5%没有关系,只是一个时间点而已,很久以前因为有禁令,很快就打到5%,所以提前就结束了,而近几年到了规定时间才到5%或者还不到5%,所以这个禁令的作用近几年就等于没有了,即使取消了禁令,打猎量也是小于等于5%的,所以禁令无用,结论不成立。

板凳
发表于 2009-8-1 15:07:00 | 只看该作者
up
地板
发表于 2009-9-18 00:39:00 | 只看该作者
thx, up
5#
发表于 2010-2-16 12:22:31 | 只看该作者
ding!!这题太狡猾了
6#
发表于 2010-3-10 20:23:34 | 只看该作者
B的意思是已经有很多年打猎季节没有因为这个禁令而提前结束了,近几年打猎季节都是按照一个规定的时间结束的,这个规定的时间跟5%没有关系,只是一个时间点而已,很久以前因为有禁令,很快就打到5%,所以提前就结束了,而近几年到了规定时间才到5%或者还不到5%,所以这个禁令的作用近几年就等于没有了,即使取消了禁令,打猎量也是小于等于5%的,所以禁令无用,结论不成立。
-- by 会员 lemuren (2009/4/27 12:50:00)
不太明白呢。。为什么说即使取消禁令打猎两也小于等于5%呢···难道不可能打得更多?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 23:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部