再加点JJ吧(补充一题数学)
Math部分 JJ上有的我就不再重复了,大概有七八道题目。我遇到了很多分数小数类的计算题,起码四题,感觉上是这个比例也太高点了吧!! 1. 5x+y>0? 1) x-y>0 2) xy<0 答案是E 2. 1/(1.0012 - 1),答案是500,我记得 3. DS题,有图 一个三角形ABC,D是AC的中点,E是AB的重点,问DE的长度可求吗? 1) BC=6 2) DC=10 答案是A。 4. 还有相会那道题目,我把数字记全了。A和B相距610km,Alonzo早上8:00从A出发,速度是90km/h。到9:30的时候Carol从B出发,速度是100km/h。问多长时间相遇。 答案是:2小时30分 5. 在一个公司里,juniors每年的人均收入是25000美元,每周工作40小时,seniors是60000美元,每周工作60小时。每周的总工作时间是620,年收入的支出总共是545000,问senior和juniors的人数总和? 答案是:12 还有的题目长得都很奇特,要不然就是数字特多,我实在是想不起来。
重点放在Verbal部分吧。 语法。我也遇到那道GWD的原题了。 有一道题大概是这样的 In Quncha, the original language of Native Americans in the xx region, Mucha, means “high mountain”… 大概是这样的,最后我把答案narrow down到了A和D中间。A不对,因为A的句式结构有使Mucha做xx region同位语的嫌疑。而且主语Mucha和谓语动词means中间用逗号隔开不对。
逻辑 我做到了一题类似的GWD的变体题目。 Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability. In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection. B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion. C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion. D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future. 但是有改写的,大概改写过后应该是这样: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived. Given the fact that farms are unmodernized and most of farmers lack the resources modernization requires, they will eventually sell their farms. If the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder. So any sold land will be purchased by developers. 问的也是黑体部分。我选的是两个都是intermediary conclusion,用来支持main conclusion的(main conclusion应该是that plan is ill-conceived,注意啊。我当时就差点忽略了这一点,而选了第二个黑体部分是main conclusion的选项)
我还遇到了JJ的46题 一个卡车运送商品,最多能装1000件,但是不能说装的越多每件商品的边际成本越小,为什么?(应该是这个意思) 这道题目,我跟大家解释一下,是典型的数学计算形逻辑题目,因为五个选项都需要时间计算,所以我记不得具体的选项了。我只记得自己选了A。应该是对的。
这道题我也遇到了【版本1】有一个题说有一个G人,反正是古时期一个著名艺术家,有人发现他一副画,但是因为画用了一种橙色的颜料,而这种颜料是他死了以后十年才开始广泛应用的,所以就有人推测说这画是假的。然而这画也不一定是假的。问原因:我选的那个选项是,因为一个什么原因,那个人也会用这种橙色的颜料,尽管那时这种颜料还没被广泛应用。我感觉是对的~反正KEY WORD: 橙色颜料,说其他特性的我觉得都不很沾边
我当时就想过一种可能性,但是鉴于JJ作者的答案也可以理解得通,所以我就没有补上去。 应该是这幅画在后来被人用橙色染料修复过。 当时考试的时候看到这个选项的时候,我就悔自己咋当时懒了呢。不过题目也不难倒是真的。
作文四篇都是JJ里面的, 刚才有童鞋让我把我精简版的阅读整理发上去。我要先抱歉一下,因为我都是中午别人吃饭的时候,在workstation边啃三明治,边整理的,所以全部存在公司电脑上,我自己没有备份。而且我这周请了假休息(九个月我才修第一个礼拜的假,可怜啊)但是我打印出来了,我会尽快再照着敲一遍。我回头把我遇到的阅读JJ补全了之后,一起放上了。为了不耽误大家复习,我就敲一篇,发一篇。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-22 15:14:16编辑过] |