求助prep47 （已查所有讨论帖）

ursula_1

47.   (34035-!-item-!-188;#058&007207) B E

Automobile emissions are a significant source of air pollutants, and cars over five years old typically generate significantly greater amounts of pollutants than newer cars.  In Torinia, which has recently built its first automobile manufacturing plant, most cars are over five years old.  Aiming to boost Torinia's economy and reduce air pollution, the government plans to introduce incentives for Torinians to scrap their old cars every five years and replace them with new ones.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the likelihood that the planned incentives, if implemented, will achieve both of the cited aims?

(A) Without the implementation of the planned incentives, most Torinians who own an old car would be unlikely to buy a new car.

(B) Torinia's automobile plant manufactures car models that typically generate smaller amounts of air pollutants than most similarly sized car models manufactured elsewhere.

(C) The new cars produced in Torinia are not likely to be exported to other countries.

(D) The largest source of atmospheric pollutants in Torinia is not automobile emissions, but emissions from power plants.

(E) The manufacture and the scrapping of cars each generate significant amounts of air pollutants.

答案是E ,E 我怎么看不懂啊？

哪位大侠帮帮我？

B 为什么不对呢？ 支持减轻污染，但说明在别地造，那么就不能兼顾经济了

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-19 20:07:10编辑过]

ursula_1

有没有牛牛能出来帮小妹看看啊？

ursula_1

版主，帮帮我吧！

kbkgqoo

題目是找weaken~!    E選項: 如果實行了新政策~~舊車換新車  
                                   工廠製造新車和報廢舊車都會製造大量的空氣污染 ~~!  不會達到目的>>改善空氣~!
                                   反而導致空氣污染更嚴重~~!!
                                   B:選項個人感覺沒什麼相關~~不知lz對B的想法如何??

crystal007

B  这个PLANT制造的车比其他地方制造的同SIZE的车释放的污染少，这样每五年一次换车刺激经济。换完车后又真真正正减少污染

E scrap 和manufacture都产生污染  即使每五年一次换车刺激了经济，但减少污染的目的并没达到，所以两个目的没有同时实现，不就是题目要的答案吗

kbkgqoo

恩恩~~~但是就算污染比別的國家生產的汽車來小~~不代表就是沒污染阿~~!!!!

別的國家造成10000人傷害~~~本國造成9999人傷害~~~是比他國小阿~~但是傷害還是很大~~

這種選項在別題也都常出現~~跟別地方的人事物去比較~~感覺是無關選項~~!!  

crystal007

但政府想要达到的只是reduce air pollution 不是彻底消除阿  跟别的地方造得同size的车比，他的车污染最小，说明已经没有其他方法可以再降低污染了（即如果比别的地方大的话还可以用其他地方生产的）

Howto

以下是引用ursula_1在2009-4-19 19:01:00的发言：

47.   (34035-!-item-!-188;#058&007207) B E

Automobile emissions are a significant source of air pollutants, and cars over five years old typically generate significantly greater amounts of pollutants than newer cars.  In Torinia, which has recently built its first automobile manufacturing plant, most cars are over five years old.  Aiming to boost Torinia's economy and reduce air pollution, the government plans to introduce incentives for Torinians to scrap their old cars every five years and replace them with new ones.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the likelihood that the planned incentives, if implemented, will achieve both of the cited aims?

(A) Without the implementation of the planned incentives, most Torinians who own an old car would be unlikely to buy a new car.

(B) Torinia's automobile plant manufactures car models that typically generate smaller amounts of air pollutants than most similarly sized car models manufactured elsewhere.

(C) The new cars produced in Torinia are not likely to be exported to other countries.

(D) The largest source of atmospheric pollutants in Torinia is not automobile emissions, but emissions from power plants.

(E) The manufacture and the scrapping of cars each generate significant amounts of air pollutants.

答案是E ,E 我怎么看不懂啊？

哪位大侠帮帮我？

B 为什么不对呢？ 支持减轻污染，但说明在别地造，那么就不能兼顾经济了

小妹妹这个题目是这样的,原文说的是如果政府用一个政策:要求超过5年的车被替换,那么就会达到目的1,减少污染2刺激经济.

B说在T这个地方生产的车比别的地方生产的同型号的车排放的污染要少.这个是无关选项.原文只说由于5年以后汽车排放的污染大了所以要改进,没有和其他地方比过.

E说生产车会产生很大的污染.这个不是削弱了吗?什么都不用往里加.就说明了污染不会减少

dontwannalose

有一点疑问，E并没有提到manufacturing and the scrapping of cars所产生污染的总量是否大于继续开旧车所产生污染的量
这种选项似乎不是OG的preference.....
求教。。。。