ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1145|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG紫皮第4题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-14 22:31:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG紫皮第4题

The price the goverment pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called"historical costing".Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage incerase,based on the current rate of inflation ,to the previous year's contractual price.

Which of the following statement,if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?

A.The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.

(A.是正确答案,其他的就不列举了)

不理解A到底是什么意思,OG的解释也不大懂,尤其是解释中的"inefficiencies"到底是什么意思

恳请各位指点指点~~~先谢过了

沙发
发表于 2009-4-15 12:00:00 | 只看该作者

看题干的题眼:economically sound 之所以历史定价是为了省钱。

结果A:投资在不必要的地方,那是浪费,即削弱。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-29 14:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部