ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: wjy_slq
打印 上一主题 下一主题

4月语文JJ太太乐wjy_slq(佳佳)RC49CR100.更新停止

[精华] [复制链接]
201#
发表于 2009-4-17 23:00:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢你们的整理,明天我也要考了,看了机经觉得更有信心了,谢谢你们,辛苦了!

202#
发表于 2009-4-18 08:31:00 | 只看该作者
酬勤,LZ MM 29号井喷... My best wishes ...
203#
发表于 2009-4-18 08:39:00 | 只看该作者

佳佳mm,补充一道考古机经。

RC-28:E大师的音乐

【版本1第一段:某黑人音乐大师E与音乐发行公司M合作在19x0~19y0年代在市场上所向披靡。一个很有效的套路就是把一段音乐男声唱,女生唱...等不同版本。同时期只有另一位黑人作曲人能与之分享同等市场地位。
                    

第二段:19y0年代后,E大师好的作品却不能有好的市场。原因:曲子复杂,都是来自ETalent instructor,别人玩不了;曲子太长,radio不爱播。
                    

第三段:古典音乐与流行音乐同时卖让情况更复杂。消费者更倾向于买流行音乐,虽然古典音乐制作更精良,价格更低。

考古机经

艾灵顿公爵和M音乐出版社的商业合作(60-70行,较长,超过1屏,3段)
第一段:
艾灵顿公爵和M音乐出版商之间的合作关系是:艾灵顿不是直接录制音乐,而是他提供活页乐谱,即他是原创音乐人(sheet music - 背景知识:以前大家估计买不起音乐录音带,所以只能听观看欣赏乐师的现场音乐表演,而活页乐谱在那时就是提供给乐师进行演奏用的[呵呵,好像和现状不一样,现在是大家看不起现场音乐会])给M出版商。然后说了当时很多著名的音乐人都是采用艾灵顿公爵的乐谱。最后提到当时艾灵顿公爵的名声很响,他自己也有一支乐队,在他同时代的玩音乐的非裔美国人中只有一个叫Fat的人可以和他媲美(Fat持有M出版社的一部分股权- 似乎是这样,有点忘记了),他也是当时著名的作曲人。(出题点:Fat和艾灵顿比有什么不同;我选了:Fat不是乐队的老大)
第二段:
讲了艾灵顿公爵后来进行了很多长音乐的创作(extended piece),这些长音乐却不受到M出版商的欢迎了。大致原因有:1) 因为太长的音乐不管是录制还是制作成活页乐谱都需要额外的成本,因此很多乐师不愿意购买这些长音乐的活页乐谱;2)这些长音乐需要的演奏技巧很高,然后列举说艾灵顿公爵乐队里的一些乐手都是当时的大拿,所以他的乐队能演奏未必其它的乐队也都有能力演奏。最后提到了说因为每人演奏,这些长音乐不流行,连电台也不愿意播放这些音乐。(有一道划线题)
第三段:(这段看的不太仔细,有些忘了)
补充说明为什么Classic没有Popular的音乐卖的好,大致是讲M音乐出版社出版艾灵顿公爵的一些古典音乐,尽管这些音乐相对比较便宜,但是仍然卖得不好。原因主要是它同时也出版流行音乐,大家都去争相购买流行音乐了。(出题点:为什么艾灵顿的古典音乐卖得不好,我选了:大家都买了流行音乐)(问这一段的作用)

204#
发表于 2009-4-18 08:50:00 | 只看该作者
3X!
205#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-18 11:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用summerfallen在2009-4-18 8:39:00的发言:

佳佳mm,补充一道考古机经。

RC-28:E大师的音乐

【版本1第一段:某黑人音乐大师E与音乐发行公司M合作在19x0~19y0年代在市场上所向披靡。一个很有效的套路就是把一段音乐男声唱,女生唱...等不同版本。同时期只有另一位黑人作曲人能与之分享同等市场地位。
     

第二段:19y0年代后,E大师好的作品却不能有好的市场。原因:曲子复杂,都是来自ETalent instructor,别人玩不了;曲子太长,radio不爱播。
     

第三段:古典音乐与流行音乐同时卖让情况更复杂。消费者更倾向于买流行音乐,虽然古典音乐制作更精良,价格更低。

考古机经

艾灵顿公爵和M音乐出版社的商业合作(60-70行,较长,超过1屏,3段)
第一段:
艾灵顿公爵和M音乐出版商之间的合作关系是:艾灵顿不是直接录制音乐,而是他提供活页乐谱,即他是原创音乐人(sheet music - 背景知识:以前大家估计买不起音乐录音带,所以只能听观看欣赏乐师的现场音乐表演,而活页乐谱在那时就是提供给乐师进行演奏用的[呵呵,好像和现状不一样,现在是大家看不起现场音乐会])给M出版商。然后说了当时很多著名的音乐人都是采用艾灵顿公爵的乐谱。最后提到当时艾灵顿公爵的名声很响,他自己也有一支乐队,在他同时代的玩音乐的非裔美国人中只有一个叫Fat的人可以和他媲美(Fat持有M出版社的一部分股权- 似乎是这样,有点忘记了),他也是当时著名的作曲人。(出题点:Fat和艾灵顿比有什么不同;我选了:Fat不是乐队的老大)
第二段:
讲了艾灵顿公爵后来进行了很多长音乐的创作(extended piece),这些长音乐却不受到M出版商的欢迎了。大致原因有:1) 因为太长的音乐不管是录制还是制作成活页乐谱都需要额外的成本,因此很多乐师不愿意购买这些长音乐的活页乐谱;2)这些长音乐需要的演奏技巧很高,然后列举说艾灵顿公爵乐队里的一些乐手都是当时的大拿,所以他的乐队能演奏未必其它的乐队也都有能力演奏。最后提到了说因为每人演奏,这些长音乐不流行,连电台也不愿意播放这些音乐。(有一道划线题)
第三段:(这段看的不太仔细,有些忘了)
补充说明为什么Classic没有Popular的音乐卖的好,大致是讲M音乐出版社出版艾灵顿公爵的一些古典音乐,尽管这些音乐相对比较便宜,但是仍然卖得不好。原因主要是它同时也出版流行音乐,大家都去争相购买流行音乐了。(出题点:为什么艾灵顿的古典音乐卖得不好,我选了:大家都买了流行音乐)(问这一段的作用)

非常非常感谢。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-18 19:17:59编辑过]
206#
发表于 2009-4-18 17:40:00 | 只看该作者

佳佳,好!

我今天发现 GWD10 的第一篇阅读Q5-Q7与你整理的JJ第22:P时代M动物的灭绝, 非常的相似,这里贴上给大家参考

According to a theory advanced

       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave

       of species extinctions that occurred

Line       in North America about 11,000 years

  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,

can be directly attributed to the arrival

of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who

were ancestors of modern Native

Americans.  However, anthropologist

 (10)      Shepard Krech points out that large

animal species vanished even in areas

where there is no evidence to demon-

strate that Paleoindians hunted them.

Nor were extinctions confined to large

 (15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption.  Krech

also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

climatic change as an explanation by

 (20)      asserting that widespread climatic

       change did indeed occur at the end of

       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes

secondary if not primary responsibility

for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,

 (25)      arguing that humans have produced

local extinctions elsewhere.  But,

according to historian Richard White,

even the attribution of secondary

responsibility may not be supported

 (30)      by the evidence.  White observes that

Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding

dates for the arrival of humans and the

       decline of large animal species, and

Krech, though aware that the dates

 (35)      are controversial, does not challenge

them; yet recent archaeological

discoveries are providing evidence

that the date of human arrival was

much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:
                

Which of the following is true about Martin’s theory, as that theory is described in the passage?

             

  1. It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
  2. It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
  3. It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
  4. It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
  5. It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.

Answer: a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q6:

In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 36-37) most probably in order to

 

  1. refute White’s suggestion that neither Maritn nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians’ contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions
  2. cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming
  3. suggest that Martin’s, Krech’s, and White’s theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question
  4. call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions
  5. provide support for White’s questioning of both Martin’s and Krech’s positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions

Answer: e

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q7:
                

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?

             

  1. Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed
  2. New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct
  3. Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras
  4. Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed
  5. New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

Answer: b

207#
发表于 2009-4-18 18:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用laurawuyizhi在2009-4-18 17:40:00的发言:

佳佳,好!

我今天发现 GWD10 的第一篇阅读Q5-Q7与你整理的JJ第22:P时代M动物的灭绝, 非常的相似,这里贴上给大家参考

According to a theory advanced

       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave

       of species extinctions that occurred

Line       in North America about 11,000 years

  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,

can be directly attributed to the arrival

of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who

were ancestors of modern Native

Americans.  However, anthropologist

 (10)      Shepard Krech points out that large

animal species vanished even in areas

where there is no evidence to demon-

strate that Paleoindians hunted them.

Nor were extinctions confined to large

 (15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption.  Krech

also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

climatic change as an explanation by

 (20)      asserting that widespread climatic

       change did indeed occur at the end of

       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes

secondary if not primary responsibility

for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,

 (25)      arguing that humans have produced

local extinctions elsewhere.  But,

according to historian Richard White,

even the attribution of secondary

responsibility may not be supported

 (30)      by the evidence.  White observes that

Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding

dates for the arrival of humans and the

       decline of large animal species, and

Krech, though aware that the dates

 (35)      are controversial, does not challenge

them; yet recent archaeological

discoveries are providing evidence

that the date of human arrival was

much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:
    

Which of the following is true about Martin’s theory, as that theory is described in the passage?

             

  1. It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
  2. It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
  3. It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
  4. It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
  5. It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.

Answer: a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q6:

In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 36-37) most probably in order to

 

 

  1. refute White’s suggestion that neither Maritn nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians’ contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions
  2. cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming
  3. suggest that Martin’s, Krech’s, and White’s theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question
  4. call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions
  5. provide support for White’s questioning of both Martin’s and Krech’s positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions

Answer: e

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q7:
    

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?

             

  1. Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed
  2. New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct
  3. Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras
  4. Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed
  5. New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

Answer: b

MM厉害的 谢过

不过第五题 TN24版本给的答案是b 我也同意b

因为就a来说 文中只是说P这群人会打猎 但没说主要就靠打猎为生

208#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-18 19:19:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用laurawuyizhi在2009-4-18 17:40:00的发言:

佳佳,好!

我今天发现 GWD10 的第一篇阅读Q5-Q7与你整理的JJ第22:P时代M动物的灭绝, 非常的相似,这里贴上给大家参考

According to a theory advanced
                        

       by researcher Paul Martin, the wave

       of species extinctions that occurred

Line       in North America about 11,000 years

  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,

can be directly attributed to the arrival

of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who

were ancestors of modern Native

Americans.  However, anthropologist

 (10)      Shepard Krech points out that large

animal species vanished even in areas

where there is no evidence to demon-

strate that Paleoindians hunted them.

Nor were extinctions confined to large

 (15)      animals:  small animals, plants, and

insects disappeared, presumably not

all through human consumption.  Krech

also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

climatic change as an explanation by

 (20)      asserting that widespread climatic

       change did indeed occur at the end of

       the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes

secondary if not primary responsibility

for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,

 (25)      arguing that humans have produced

local extinctions elsewhere.  But,

according to historian Richard White,

even the attribution of secondary

responsibility may not be supported

 (30)      by the evidence.  White observes that

Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding

dates for the arrival of humans and the

       decline of large animal species, and

Krech, though aware that the dates

 (35)      are controversial, does not challenge

them; yet recent archaeological

discoveries are providing evidence

that the date of human arrival was

much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5:
    

Which of the following is true about Martin’s theory, as that theory is described in the passage?

             

  1. It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
  2. It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
  3. It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
  4. It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
  5. It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.

Answer: a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q6:

In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 36-37) most probably in order to

 

 

  1. refute White’s suggestion that neither Maritn nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians’ contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions
  2. cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming
  3. suggest that Martin’s, Krech’s, and White’s theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question
  4. call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions
  5. provide support for White’s questioning of both Martin’s and Krech’s positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions

Answer: e

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q7:
    

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech’s objections to Martin’s theory?

             

  1. Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed
  2. New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct
  3. Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras
  4. Researchers’ discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed
  5. New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

Answer: b

谢谢 我稍后会加进去的
209#
发表于 2009-4-19 00:02:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵
210#
发表于 2009-4-19 12:11:00 | 只看该作者
感谢啊!因为有你,CD才更精彩!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-23 20:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部