求高手解释一下这道CR题

bollenyyy

Editorial:
        In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A.      The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

B.       Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

C.      People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.

D.      The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.

E.       People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案是C，怎么也看不明白为啥是C。脑子别住了。

谢先！

大胖

建议lz以后CR发帖至逻辑区。C 已有工作的人如果找新工作容易拿到更高的收入（因为有工作经验）。这就是对于那些没有工作的人的incentive ，长远的眼光看问题。

bollenyyy

太感谢拉。

好，记住拉，下次发正确板块。

FCUKgirl

很有道理, 谢谢!

hang13

楼上的名字很暴力=.=