|
Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money. Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
A. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes. B. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape. C. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards. D. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping. E. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined. ANS:B 這題的疑問是~~~那個問句~~我會覺得他是要問哪一個可以做為criticism 的 抗辯的basis~~! 所以感覺要選的是支持Criticism的選項~~但是答案B選項~是反對Criticism 支持 Brochore來換成 water-concerving landscape~~ 請問大家把 rebutal of the criticism 當成是 criticism的反例嗎? 所以才選weaken criticism~的B選項? the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism? 怎麼翻比較好呢? 感謝大家!! | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-3-26 10:12:00
楼主