a question, thanks!

snowflower

After graduating form high school, people rarely multiply fractions or discuss ancient Rome, but they are confronted daily with decisions relating to home economics. Yet whereas mathematics and history are required courses in the high school curriculum, home economics is only an elective, and few students choose to take it.


which of the following positions would be best su[[prted by the considerations above?


A. If mathematics and history were not required courses, few students would choose to take them.


B. Whereas home economics would be the most useful subject for people facing the decisions they must make in daily life, often mathematics and history can also help themface these decisions.


C. If it is important to teach high school students subjects that relate to ecisions that will confront them in their daily lives, then home economics should be made an important part of the high school curriculum.


D. Mathamatics, history, and other courses that are not directly relevant to a person's daily life should not be a required part of the high school curriculum.


E. Unless high schools put more emphasis on nonacademic subjects like home economics, people graduation from high school will never feel comfortable about making the ecisions that will confront them in their daily lives.


the answer is C.     please tell me the precess of the reasoning. thanks!

weiyu

B weaken the conclusion. C justify the purpose of teaching is not for daily events, so it is no use to provide home enonomic course

番茄炒蛋

在c中有一个概念上的跳跃，而这个跳跃在原文中的


they are confronted daily with decisions relating to home economics


有所补充


实际上就是解释了home economics的概念


这样c就是可以被接受的了