ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In 1960's studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of "coping" behavior-such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals-attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2005|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD-TN-24-19. No. 7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-21 04:17:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD-TN-24-19. No. 7

7. GWD28-Q7:

In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly.  But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent.  Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A.      All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.

B.       In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.

C.      Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.

D.      Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.

E.       Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to behavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.

希望大家能指出这道题的逻辑思路

谢谢指点!


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-21 4:22:16编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-3-21 10:40:00 | 只看该作者

背景讲猴子R没有老鼠那么有攻击性,问题问所有的猴子没有老鼠那么有攻击性。其中就有gap了。

C解决了这个问题,把猴子R和所有的猴子联系起来。猴子R比其他猴子更容易被激怒。猴子R>所有的猴子,又因为老鼠>猴子R,所以就推出老鼠>猴子R>所有的猴子。起到了加强作用。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-21 11:11:00 | 只看该作者

多谢,多谢, 基本没看到any species of monkey,想破头也没想出来

现在清楚了,感激不尽!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 15:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部