ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1168|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SC JJ SC-5 So ... as to ... 讨论,谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-19 03:22:00 | 只看该作者

SC JJ SC-5 So ... as to ... 讨论,谢谢!

5 有一条题SO ... AS 把我考到了,大意是说,科学技术发展可能显得如此平淡以至长久下来它们会INVISIBLE:

Technologies … so mundane as to be invisible还是as they are invisible

如果是SO..THAT就会好清晰。可惜不是

这里to be invisible的逻辑主语是technologies,即使有so that选项中,也应该优先用so ... as to ...,对吗?

沙发
发表于 2009-3-19 03:44:00 | 只看该作者

好像是吧,这样so as to会简洁一点

板凳
发表于 2009-3-19 09:24:00 | 只看该作者

也感觉带TO 会简洁些

地板
发表于 2009-3-19 09:24:00 | 只看该作者

大全91

1.         Although one link in the chain was demonstrated to be weak, but not sufficiently so to require the recall of the automobile.

(A) demonstrated to be weak, but not sufficiently so to require

(B) demonstrated as weak, but it was not sufficiently so that it required

(C) demonstrably weak, but not sufficiently so to require

(D) demonstrably weak, it was not so weak as to requireD

(E) demonstrably weak, it was not weak enough that it required

91, sec02-14

Choices A and C entail ungrammatical constructions because they do not produce a sentence that has a main clause with a subject and a verb. In choice B, demonstrated as weak is unidiomatic; also in choices B and C Although and but should not be used together because only one is needed to express the relationship between the ideas. Choice D is best. Choice E is less concise and idiomatic than D; moreover, it is imprecise to say that one link in the chain (the referent of it) actually required the recall. The question is of middle difficulty.

E: it required已经发生,确实需要recall;而原意是还没so weak以至于要recall


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-19 9:26:53编辑过]
5#
发表于 2009-3-19 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

prep不是有个例子吗

174.
            
(28920-!-item-!-188;#058&003515)

 

Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets.

A. so gradual as to be indistinguishable

B. so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable

C. so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished

D. gradual enough
            not to be distinguishable

E. gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them

6#
发表于 2009-3-19 09:28:00 | 只看该作者

B 如果把 第二个SO去了呢?

WORDY?

7#
发表于 2009-3-19 09:42:00 | 只看该作者
恩 wordy 而且they can be indistinguishable有点古怪我觉得 A里正好略去这些问题 因为A还原是they
        are indistinguishable
8#
发表于 2009-3-19 10:26:00 | 只看该作者

而且 can 与 indistinguishable 重复 哈哈

9#
发表于 2009-3-19 10:48:00 | 只看该作者
有道理 倒是忽略了这个
10#
发表于 2009-3-19 11:09:00 | 只看该作者
原句没有情态动词的意味 但是B却加了情态动词 to be和can be要表达的语气不一样的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 22:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部