新PREP1-219

Raymond_GMAT

以下是引用天蝎座1107在2009/4/20 23:55:00的发言：

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.

A. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

B. The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
  这里that made不可以改成making现在分词

C. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established and established前面没有并列谓语错

D. Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established that made不可以改成making现在分词

E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing彻底改变句子重心

但是我不明白的是A中 also established前面为什么要价格逗号呢? sorry,我总是问很钻牛角尖的问题 但是我得搞明白啊

A中用逗号隔开是为了让句子结构看上去更加清晰，个人见解。

Amber1991

D应该是错在两个participle放在句首，而后才出现句子的主语，是不对的，OG12TH有过类似的题目

echo200205

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.

A. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

B. The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
       这里that made不可以改成making现在分词
MM，这里我有个疑问：making是不是可以看作是非谓语啊？逻辑主语就The Act of Confress。这句话的错误主要是which造成的不简洁呢？
C. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established and established前面没有并列谓语错

D. Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established that made不可以改成making现在分词
同B, making是不是可以看作是非谓语啊？逻辑主语就The Act of Confress
E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing彻底改变句子重心
但是我不明白的是A中 also established前面为什么要价格逗号呢? sorry,我总是问很钻牛角尖的问题 但是我得搞明白啊

-- by 会员 天蝎座1107 (2009/4/20 23:55:00)

nst1308

副词不能做连词啊，also前需要加and，或者直接去掉also，为什么A对了？？

zanyingsan

副词不能做连词啊，also前需要加and，或者直接去掉also，为什么A对了？？

-- by 会员 nst1308 (2009/12/7 14:15:44)

这里also前面的",...,"是个插入语，不是逗号。

sumerlaw

从语法结构上来看,E是没错的,但是句子的意思就不对了,E表明 the act of congress made provision这个动作使得Library congress建立了,逻辑不合理,made和establish是并列关系,而不是从属关系,且also这个词表明动作从意思上来讲是平行的,A符合这个要求

lolmandy

感觉A缺了个谓语动词啊。。。。。 或者把那个逗号去了。。。。
有人能帮我吗？？

软磨硬泡

感觉A缺了个谓语动词啊。。。。。 或者把那个逗号去了。。。。
有人能帮我吗？？

-- by 会员 lolmandy (2010/1/3 19:29:51)

谓语动词就是established

软磨硬泡

以下是引用zanyingsan在2009/9/27 20:03:00的发言：

这道题自己做prep也错了，现在回来看看，感觉如下：
原句 Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.
句子结构：

(状语，) 主语 (that made............city)  (,city的同位语,) also established........

同位语作为插入结构必须前后都有逗号。

approved部分是次要的状语修饰成分；made provision for是对主语act的紧密的修饰成分，所以用从句；also是副词不是连词，所以also established...是本句谓语+宾语，并不是并列成分。

B,D两选项将approve...作为that从句，而making...作为伴随状语，我认为是将两者在句中的重要性做了错误的变化。

C中最后部分的and是连词，相当于另起一个句子与前面并列，则前句没有谓语动词了。所以不对。

E将本句的主谓宾换成伴随，将从句变成了主句，意思重心颠倒了。
本人verbal大白菜一颗，这两天仔细研究了一下句子结构（白勇第二章），感觉有所悟。

初次对verbal题发表一下自己的看法。。说的不对的地方，请大家指正=）

-- by 会员 piggyuu (2009/10/2 15:30:00)

赞成这个！

lovepiao

D is wrong because, it is following the sentence structure,
<Modifier>,<Modifier><Subject>
which is wrong.

Good sentence structure should be
<Modifier>,<Subject>,<Modifier>

that is very well done in A and E.
Hope this would have answered your question

C - changed the meaning by misplacing the modifier.

B - suffers from a couple of issues
1) tense change - was approved, making, established
2) parellism

E also suffers from above issue