求新东方橘皮书一道削弱题

xinglufree

opponents of law that require aotomobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as the result of taking risks.as a result, they conclude that it shoudle be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

A many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.

B automonile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injures or deaths of people not wearing seat belts

C passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.

D the rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.

E in automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts

我不明白B为什么对

静夜

我觉得是他因削弱

xinglufree

为什么啊？你能说的详细点吗，谢谢！！！

Jiangchuandi

这道题是否定了逻辑链的原因部分

前提是：在不伤害别人利益的情况下，有选择冒险的权利

B选项中，汽车保险费的上升，是由于没有系安全带的人造成的，但是保险费要所有开车的人交，这样来说，就伤害了别人的利益。

所以，原因被削弱了。