[求助]GWD-15-38，谢谢啦！

allan_z01

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most rertail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Whch of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the praposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance permiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public

C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking

E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would consitiute a fire hazard.

答案是E，我选了C，并且现在还不知道E是怎么对的。希望大家帮助我！

allan_z01

希望NN不吝赐教

ff7250

看不懂，谢谢LZ提供题目，请NN们赐教~

JFYung

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most rertail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

在一个州，所有城镇都有禁烟的法令；一个请愿“请愿为了全州禁烟”被散布给选民被一群人，他们只问一个问题“你是否愿意为全州禁烟而签名”这个请愿团体倡议了一个全州的法令禁止吸引在大多数零售店和政府开放给公众的机构办公室中。

大概讲的就是请愿团队的方式以及情愿团队的愿景的问题

Whch of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the praposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

下面哪一个会误导选民？

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance permiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

吸烟导致健康支出高 而保费高 影响到不吸烟人的利益；和情愿 和哪里不能吸烟无关

B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public

农村里，很少零售店和对大众开放的办公室。没有关系第一是农村这个概念有局限 第二是有没有零售店和办公室 无关

C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

州法令将取代本地的禁烟法令；这和这帮情愿人的愿景貌似也没有什么关系 但相对于前2个貌似更优选一点 有联系

D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking

有相当多的观点？在选民中 对于这个州的禁烟法令；这里讲的是有不同的观点 无关

E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would consitiute a fire hazard

州的法令没有影响现存的当地法令，在这些地方禁烟：消防队认为抽烟将引发火灾，就是这个选项了

因为其实情愿团队误导了选民 因为他们只问一个问题 而实际上他们的倡议要求很多地方都禁烟

286的幸福观

哪里的答案？这道题目毫无疑问是B

经典题，注意问题的提问：make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide? 对那些认为这个proposal是当地限令州扩展的选民的一个误导。

题目说：所有城市和镇都已经有这个限令了，而这个petetion的场所却又局限于某些场所，如果这些场所只是在城市和镇里才有的话，那么所谓的extending是不成立的，因为（答案B）扩展的主要对象（现在没有禁令的rural areas)没有上文提到的那些场所，所以petetion是误导。

ff7250

晕了