ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2094|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG10-157

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-7 11:21:00 | 只看该作者

OG10-157

Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P
157.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.
(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.
(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees of Company O.
(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident.
(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single machine
正确选项是b,为什么说P公司的事故类型多于O公司,就能weak the conclusion?
沙发
发表于 2009-2-7 13:50:00 | 只看该作者

应该是说P公司把更多类型的事故归于job-related事故,因此看起来比O公司(不把某些类型的事故算进总数)发生事故要多。

要点是比较范围(标准)不一致,导致结论被削弱。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-7 14:03:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢stevexdx,我懂啦~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-5 07:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部