ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (TWDV)

00:00:00

To prevent some conflicts of interest, Congress could prohibit high-level government officials from accepting positions as lobbyists for three years after such officials leave government service. One such official concluded, however, that such a prohibition would be unfortunate because it would prevent high-level government officials from earning a livelihood for three years.

The official's conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3134|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] 到底Assumption是什么????

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-5 16:43:00 | 只看该作者

[求助] 到底Assumption是什么????

如果有三段论

1 A -> B 而且 2 B->C

则有结论  3 A->C

简写为 1 premises & 2 assumption => 3 conclusion

但是在做OG第8题的时候,好像有【结论 -> Assumption】感觉

OG10第8题

8.

To prevent some conflicts of interest, Congress could prohibit high-level government officials from accepting positions as lobbyists for three years after such officials leave government service. One such official concluded, however, that such a prohibition would be unfortunate because it would prevent high-level government officials from earning a livelihood for three years.

 

The official’s conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?

 

A. Laws should not restrict the behavior of former government officials.

B. Lobbyists are typically people who have previously been high-level government officials.

C. Low-level government officials do not often become lobbyists when they leave government service.

D. High-level government officials who leave government service are capable of earning a livelihood only as lobbyists.

E. High-level government officials who leave government service are currently permitted to act as lobbyists for only three years.

 

8.

关于B答案的排除

The official’s argument does not depend on the assumption in B, since the argument would not be invalidated if lobbyists were not typically former high-level government officials.

可以视为 非Assumption    无法推出    非结论,

其实也就是用如果有那个assumption满足:

非Assumption    ->     非结论 则这个Assumption就是conlcusion depends on 的Assumption

用逆反命题的原则就应该有  结论 -> Assumption

这个和Premises + Assumptions -》 Conclusion 有矛盾啊

沙发
发表于 2009-8-21 22:21:00 | 只看该作者

assumption 有两种:充分性 and 必要性
充分性就是架桥的意思

Congress prohibit gov officials from accepting positions as lobbyists

推出

prevent gov officials from earning a livelihood

position as lobbyistsearning a livelihood之间没有桥梁

这道题就是充分性assumption, 所以要架桥
答案就是gov officials earning a livelihood only as lobbyists

关于assumption可以看NN的分析

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=402511&replyID=&skin=0


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/21 22:22:27编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 14:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部