ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 从今天开始
打印 上一主题 下一主题

1.28后AWA机经AI(2.4号03:40更新至第三十篇)一楼添加word下载

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2009-2-6 13:51:00 | 只看该作者

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=26&replyID=2330195&id=248737&skin=0

(AIB2) 关于这题的讨论噢 需要的可以看一下

B2. Although most people wish to live long lives, attempting to significantly extend the average human life span would be a mistake. If achieved, this would place an enormous burden on resources, lowering the quality of life for everyone.

22#
发表于 2009-2-9 16:55:00 | 只看该作者

LZ辛苦啦。WORD方便多了。感謝!

23#
发表于 2009-2-11 11:14:00 | 只看该作者
1月的AWA的JJ哪里可以找到啊?
24#
发表于 2009-2-14 14:59:00 | 只看该作者

第三十篇:maychien7643  2/2台北一战惨败(math/RC/CR/AA/AI)

AIThe best business leaders are those who maintain high ethical standards.

is this one????????

AI-111.

Topic: “The most effective business leaders are those who maintain the highest ethical standards.”

 最有效率的企业领导是保持最高道德标准的人。

25#
发表于 2009-2-17 09:33:00 | 只看该作者
问一个菜鸟问题···为什么不更新了?是因为没人提供了,还是2月就这些题目···谢谢
26#
发表于 2009-2-18 15:27:00 | 只看该作者

2.12碰到的

114. “Technology ultimately separates and alienates people more than it serves to bring them together.”
            

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your posit ion with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

翻译:技术最终分离疏远了人们而不是把他们聚在一起。
讨论你在何种程度上赞成或不赞成上述观点。从你自身的经验,观察和阅读给出相关的原因and/or例子来支持你的观点。

27#
发表于 2009-2-21 08:15:00 | 只看该作者

2.17 北美

Governmemts should establish regulations for the organizations or organizations set up their own standards and rules.

28#
发表于 2009-2-23 00:09:00 | 只看该作者

找到一篇范文,仅供大家参考 .我个人感觉此人语言高深,用词强悍,值得研究,但是貌似套了模板,自己的观点表达的很含糊。

The value of any nation should be measured more by its scientific and artistic achievements than by its business successes.”

The value of any nation is broadly debated topic that attracted many people attentions. In his argument, the author alleges that the value of any nation should be measured more by its scientific and artistic achievements than by its business successes. However, the author does not necessarily extend this broad contention to a changeless example while overlooking certain compelling causes impacting on the issue. Moreover, the issue is so controversial and complicated that many people may hold on their individual opinions to face such issue because of their different culture, experience, and background. Because in fact there is no general explanation to answer the issue, the final conclusion depends on a cautious analysis. As far as I am concerned, I partially agree with the author that the value of any nation should be more measured by its scientific and artistic achievements, but I do not agree with him that the value of any nation should be measured more by its scientific and artistic achievements than by its business successes.

First of all, it is judicious to admit point of the issue even though such point may suffer from some explicit shortcoming, form some merits primarily because the rationale behind the author’s assertion according with common sense and our experience as human beings, hence is fundamentally indisputable. For example, an advanced technology such as the discovery of computer, the Internet, and communicative equipment can result in linking with the world conveniently. Besides, artistic achievement also can increase the quality of our life, and cease our pressure in the modern society. However, the author could effortlessly explain the scenario, in which business behavior plays an important role in modern nation. Therefore, I tend to concede that when it comes to some certain circumstances it is partially appropriate.

In addition, before recognizing that a more appropriate reason must incorporate aspects of the issue as sufficient as possible, I need to point out my argument with the author who, while he exaggerated the point of the importance of artistic and scientific achievement, neglects some determinative factors at which people often thoughtlessly take a look. Thus, the point for me to argue is that we totally do not engage in any activities if we do not have enough assets to invest. To strengthen the point of the issue, I have to consider whether the nation owns enough assets to develop other activities. For some developing nation, it is important to stimulate the economy of nation. Hence, in some standpoint, I do not agree with the author that the value of any nation should be measured more by its scientific and artistic achievements than by its business successes.

In conclusion, the issue of value of nation is a complex and comprehensive, requiring subjective judgment. So different are the personal experience, personality type among people with diverse culture that thousand individual might possess thousand opinions towards the issue. In the final analysis, according to me, the value of nation primarily depends on its economic circumstance.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-23 0:19:48编辑过]
29#
发表于 2009-2-24 09:19:00 | 只看该作者
2.23 北美
AI:
科學家時常redefine standards for what can be benefit or harmful to the environment。企業無法適從(大概是這樣)。最後建議政府regulate。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-22 05:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部