大全-5-20

horsefish

20. For a local government to outlawall strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
答案C

请帮忙翻译一下题干? 俺看得晕头转向的.

番茄炒蛋

这题关键是第一句话
For a local government to outlawall strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration
对于政府这是一个costly的
所以有c中的对工人是有利的
这个解释虽然比较牵强，但是总比其他几个选项要来的好一些