ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1962|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急。。小弟实在是看不懂 GWD-q2, q3-40

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-12-31 01:21:00 | 只看该作者

急。。小弟实在是看不懂 GWD-q2, q3-40

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

  1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
  2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
  3. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
  4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
  5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

实在是不明白为什么E是答案。我觉得E support the arugment.

还有这个为什么是C不明白

For most people, the left half of the brain controls linguistic capabilities, but some people have their language centers in the right half.  When a language center of the brain is damaged, for example by a stroke, linguistic capabilities are impaired in some way.  Therefore, people who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering any such impairment must have their language centers in the right half.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the reasoning in the argument above depends?

 

  1. No part of a person’s brain that is damaged by a stroke ever recovers.
  2. Impairment of linguistic capabilities does not occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain.
  3. Strokes tend to impair linguistic capabilities more severely than does any other cause of damage to language centers in the brain.
  4. If there are language centers on the left side of the brain, any serious stroke affecting that side of the brain damages at least one of them.
  5. It is impossible to determine which side of the brain contains a person’s language centers if the person has not suffered damage to either side of the brain.

   Answer: D


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-31 6:33:59编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-12-31 16:07:00 | 只看该作者

第一题:removing the tariff ->more farmers could profit by growing cashews->decreasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities -> 减少城市失业人口压力。所以免除关税是有利于降低城市失业率的,政府最后结论不对

第二题:答案明明是D啊

板凳
发表于 2009-1-1 19:05:00 | 只看该作者

22题说的是一个方法(撞击左脑,若语言功能正常,language centers在右脑

方法建立在什么样的假设基础上会成立呢?---撞击是否dmange language centers..D正好说的就是这个

a无关讨论,没讨论 recover的问题。

b无关讨论,没涉及语言功能障碍发生在那些人身上

c无关比较

d正确,撞击会dmange language centers

e无关讨论,没关心是否有其他方法确定dmange language所在的位置

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-5 17:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部