[讨论]重新整理后的阅读逻辑更清晰（截至到51篇阅读）

Sophia0703

辛苦啦LZ！！加油！

ktkoalaml

顶！！！版主加油！我12/15杀G……

Gillianwei

楼主太好了！

zion3230

楼主真好！谢谢楼主^_^

少林考僧

具体看这个700分补充说明：

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=22&id=363064&star=2#3226998

似乎像第二篇或者第一篇

我那篇主要是说现在有经理的power 的转变
公司由hierarchy structure 开始分散
        然后经理的power减少``似乎这样的

刚对了一下几经
        我被考到了那个法国妇女裁缝的那篇`` 题目实在不记得了

 

butterfly24

楼主费心了，多谢啊！

少林考僧

还是那个700分的补充：

“我那篇是讲法国新出了一种衣服
女性裁缝才能做`(这里似乎有一题目) 有个学者就一直介绍这个trend
第二断 这个学者说了一个观点 虽然这种衣服带给了女裁缝很多机会,但是确组织了她们被男裁缝保护```等等”

这3个字是“但是却阻止了她们被男裁缝保护```”吧？

参考其他人的回忆：

版本
            分数一般

一篇是法国战前妇女地位，也不长。

第一段说根据某某的一本书，说在19世纪一种什么宽松的衣服（貌似贵族才能穿）不再由男性TAILOR负责了——这里有考点，问这种衣服在19世纪前的作用。

第二段说另一个女性的观点和类似，但是对什么什么有些不同——这里有考点。她有点像GWD的一篇缝纫行业，但是不是。

饔牛

我看看，结合这两个的看法，可以证明的是，这篇文章是2段

第一段，有考点，还是supporting detail。说了法国出现一种新的服饰，（只要贵族才能穿？不确定）但是可以确定的是这种衣服只有法国的女裁缝可以做，所以不再由男裁缝复杂（为什么呢？因为这里有考题：这种新衣服在19世纪之前的作用？，广大考生请注意！）

第二段：ETS引入了另一个人的新观点（BTW，第一段的观点是什么？）说了虽然这种衣服带给了女裁缝很多机会,但是确组织了她们被男裁缝保护```等等（这里也有考点）

-----------

我更新了，但是似乎这篇文章有三段，起码三个问题。

总而言之，这篇文章信息太残缺。如果遇到请不要依赖我的基金，自己看懂最重要。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-12 14:01:06编辑过]

nurseryamy

關於第3篇法国妇女地位，是不是GWD 13 Q13~16啊? 越看越觉得熟，我手上没有这篇文章的题目，只有搜寻到文章内容，可以请好心的牛牛补充一下题目，还有JJ主人却认识不是这篇吗?

gwd 13-16~19

Q16 to Q19:

In 1675, Louis XIV
                        

established the Parisian

seamstresses’ guild, the first

Line independent all-female guild

(5) created in over 200 years.

Guild members could make

and sell women’s and chil-

dren’s clothing, but were

prohibited from producing

(10) men’s clothing or dresses

for court women. Tailors

resented the ascension of

seamstresses to guild status;

seamstresses, meanwhile,

(15) were impatient with the

remaining restrictions on

their right to clothe women.

The conflict between

the guilds was not purely

(20) economic, however. A 1675

police report indicated that

since so many seamstresses

were already working illegally,

the tailors were unlikely to

(25) suffer additional economic

damage because of the

seamstresses’ incorporation.

Moreover, guild membership

held very different meanings

(30) for tailors and seamstresses.

To the tailors, their status as

guild members overlapped

with their role as heads of

household, and entitled them

(35) to employ as seamstresses

female family members who

did not marry outside the trade.

The seamstresses, however,

viewed guild membership as

(40) a mark of independence from

the patriarchal family. Their

guild was composed not of

family units but of individual

women who enjoyed unusual

(45) legal and economic privileges.

At the conflict’s center was

the issue of whether tailors’

female relatives should be

identified as family members

(50) protected by the tailors’ guild

or as individuals under the

jurisdiction of the seam-

stresses’ guild.

09saiwinner

LZ辛苦啦！！

非常感谢！！！