ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: xinhz001
打印 上一主题 下一主题

12月CRJJ汇总贴全新改版至25日共56题2楼新添加Freya同学的分类整理版

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2008-12-10 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢总结jj的mm

也谢谢贡献jj的xdjm

22#
发表于 2008-12-10 19:11:00 | 只看该作者
23#
发表于 2008-12-10 20:25:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢
24#
发表于 2008-12-11 03:18:00 | 只看该作者

关于cooking,请大家确认。

GWD 5-Q30:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

A.      many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life

B.       it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

C.      cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

D.      certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

E.       for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

Correct Answer: E?


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-11 3:20:30编辑过]
25#
发表于 2008-12-11 03:26:00 | 只看该作者
GWD倒是出了很多关于insurance的,有的关于年龄群,有的关于政府政策,但是我好像不记得有说herbal medication的么。。大家也想想?
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-11 3:25:54编辑过]
26#
发表于 2008-12-11 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用饔牛在2008-12-11 3:18:00的发言:

关于cooking,请大家确认。

GWD 5-Q30:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

A.      many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life

B.       it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

C.      cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

D.      certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

E.       for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

Correct Answer: E?


I think should be E.
27#
发表于 2008-12-11 19:56:00 | 只看该作者

^^

^^3q thx
28#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-12-11 23:33:00 | 只看该作者
感谢襄牛的支持!!

29#
发表于 2008-12-12 00:22:00 | 只看该作者

再更新下:考到这道

GWD26-Q22

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion?支持
            

A.    A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.  T
    

B.    A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets

C.    The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.

D.    Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.   

E.     Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.

30#
发表于 2008-12-12 00:24:00 | 只看该作者

饔牛同学无所不在啊!

你这个ID里的“饔”如何拼?

谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-17 23:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部