B

yxjpxlyh

<p>本来准备用Brandeis来保底的, 现在看来我不申他家是对的</p>

新人

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>新人</i>在2008-12-7 18:16:00的发言：</b><br/><p>Btw, not only Purdue, I think UIUC is better than LSE in China job market. Not to mention WUSTL and BC</p><p>And I think it is harder to get admitted&nbsp;by UIUC than&nbsp;by LSE</p></div><p>If my friends from the States saw that, they will quote this as 'Joke of the year ' </p><p></p><p>OK, you can ask any Chinese company HR, which guy they want? a LSE MSF guy and a UIUC MSF guy?</p><p>LSE students ruins its reputation.</p><p>LSE is better than WUSTL or&nbsp;BC? I think Oxford is not better than WUSTL or BC.</p><p></p><p></p>

新人

<p>...</p><br /><div align="right"><font color="#000066">[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-15 13:35:52编辑过]</font></div>

1987kevin

<p>you&nbsp;may stop here as well...</p><p>as you do not want to apply to LSE, someone else may stand better. Since you are indeed very strong applicant.</p><p>And...the N guy you mentioned is very N, while getting into Princeton for him is not guaranteed this year, as far as I can see.There are still heck lot out there with that kind of profile.</p>

新人

<p>...</p><br /><div align="right"><font color="#000066">[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-15 13:36:14编辑过]</font></div>

1987kevin

<p>WTH&nbsp;are you talking about...</p><p>I said that "Brandies is very good" and "you are very strong" and I am not applying to UK, while LSE is good...</p>

csmonitor

火气不用这么大吧，大家都是一起申请学校的人，用不着剑拔弩张。每个人都有自己的价值观，这本来就是难能可贵的多元文化....何必弄的你死我活，非此即彼呢？

1987kevin

牛人到哪都有饭吃 period.

cynthiakong

<p>我很同情其他武汉大学的同学们……</p><p>这丑出的，跳进黄河洗不清了……</p>

1987kevin

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>新人</i>在2008-12-7 17:14:00的发言：</b><br/>OK 我是武大金融 年年拿二等奖学金 GMAT 750 Toefl 103&nbsp; </div><p></p><p>靠！刚才还没看到，越看越生气。</p><p>你这profile在我们这边也就中等，申LSE的比你高的多了去了啊</p><p>算了，你还是别申了</p>