关于不定式用法的知识点小结

aeoluseros

以下是引用sabriye在2008-12-10 21:05:00的发言：

我任然不很明白，那什么时候不定式需要不出宾语什么时候需要省略呢？

还有上面这题不定式做目的状语，似乎逻辑主语不是句子主语啊？

只有不定式所修饰的对象是其逻辑宾语不定式后面的宾语才能够省略。而这里to keep from的修饰对象是was buried，或者可以说是bury的施动者，其修饰的不是它的逻辑宾语chalice，所以要补出it以避免歧义。

换个讲法可以参见这里：

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=477355&id=27198&page=1&skin=0&Star=3

AlienX

章振邦语法里发现了类似的句子<=可以post一下嗎? =D

aeoluseros

sorry,我的一时疏忽没有贴上来，章振邦p1087的两个例句：
I stopped for him to speak to me.
He opened the door for the children to come in.

sabriye

明白了~~非常感谢

萍踪侠影

好帖，双手双脚顶。。。

sabriye

171.
    In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn.

(A) so as to marry

(B) and so could be married to

(C) to be married to

(D) so that he could marry（D）

(E) in order that he would marry

The sentence calls for an adverbial clause of purpose to explain why Henry sought the annulment. D, the best choice, does this clearly and correctly. It is introduced by an appropriate conjunction, so that, and contains a logically appropriate verb form, could marry. Awkward and imprecise, A does not specify who is to marry Anne. B substitutes an illogical coordinate predicate for the needed purpose clause; because the annulment had not yet been granted, Henry could not remarry. C lacks an appropriate conjunction, and the infinitive clause to be married to... makes this choice awkward and unidiomatic. Although E uses an appropriate conjunction, in order that, the verb form would marry is unidiomatic and illogical (might marry would be better).

对了，那请问这题的C不能直接用to do是不是也是因为annulled的人不是king henry？？加上in order就ok了？in order to和不定式to do sth修饰有何不同呢？？

还有一个和不是不定式的问题：would这里说不好要用may、might是不是因为would会表示虚拟语气呢？

还有听说in order that后面不能加代词要用名词，版主听过这种说法么？可能是偶的问题太白痴了，顶了好几次后没人理555555麻烦版主一道看看吧，谢谢了

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-12 9:53:27编辑过]

sabriye

顶一下

aeoluseros

以下是引用sabriye在2008-12-12 9:37:00的发言：

171.
    In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn.

(A) so as to marry

(B) and so could be married to

(C) to be married to

(D) so that he could marry（D）

(E) in order that he would marry

The sentence calls for an adverbial clause of purpose to explain why Henry sought the annulment. D, the best choice, does this clearly and correctly. It is introduced by an appropriate conjunction, so that, and contains a logically appropriate verb form, could marry. Awkward and imprecise, A does not specify who is to marry Anne. B substitutes an illogical coordinate predicate for the needed purpose clause; because the annulment had not yet been granted, Henry could not remarry. C lacks an appropriate conjunction, and the infinitive clause to be married to... makes this choice awkward and unidiomatic. Although E uses an appropriate conjunction, in order that, the verb form would marry is unidiomatic and illogical (might marry would be better).

对了，那请问这题的C不能直接用to do是不是也是因为annulled的人不是king henry？？加上in order就ok了？in order to和不定式to do sth修饰有何不同呢？？

还有一个和不是不定式的问题：would这里说不好要用may、might是不是因为would会表示虚拟语气呢？

还有听说in order that后面不能加代词要用名词，版主听过这种说法么？可能是偶的问题太白痴了，顶了好几次后没人理555555麻烦版主一道看看吧，谢谢了

C lacks an appropriate conjunction, and the infinitive clause to be married to ... makes this choice awkward and unidiomatic.
umm...其实也不算不定式问题，be merried to 表示状态，get merried to 表示动作，c答案是表示动作所以be merried to 不对。除了这点，C里面前面是动作，to be married却表达一个状态，中间必须要有连接词。同样的C里面确实存在跟A一样的逻辑主语问题。

第二个，would在此不会产生虚拟语气的歧义，因为格式不符合。不用would是因为would是will的过去式，是一种比较肯定的语气，而henry当时还没有把她老婆休掉，所以不肯定不能用would.用语气并不是那么肯定的might.

最后一个说法没有听说过...OG里面出现过几次用in order that的，但是都没有说到后面跟代词是错的，而且我认为说某个表达方式后面不能跟代词没有根据，不符合逻辑(一不是固定搭配，二没有逻辑歧义或错误)。但是in order that没有so that简洁。

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-14 12:51:36编辑过]

拒信飞来

aeoluseros

哈哈，饿死我了吃饭去.