ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2462|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD17-Q11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-11-28 09:30:00 | 只看该作者

GWD17-Q11

11. GWD17-Q11:
            

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

 

A.      Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

B.      It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

C.      The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

D.      As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

E.       In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

B

沙发
发表于 2008-11-29 21:13:00 | 只看该作者

这一题我做的时候也是选的d,但是答案是B。B的翻译大概“是很多年来真正限制捕猎snow geese的时间比要求的要早”,就是说捕猎不会导致S的减少,限制的时间也没有起作用,所以即使取消了限制也不会影响S的数量。不知道这样理解的对不对~~大家讨论

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-11-30 11:13:00 | 只看该作者

我仔细研究了一下,看来这道题所说的restriction是指 hunting season 的时间限制。

所以说题里面要取消的限制 也是指这个 hunting season 的time line.

如果这样理解,那b选项,因为5%总是先达到,所以取消这个时间限制也没用

我之前一直把这个restriction理解成了 5%的数目限制。

地板
发表于 2008-12-11 01:00:00 | 只看该作者

It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

 

The restriction has led to the hunting season being closed earlier than the schedule date, the ecologic balance of the nature has well prepared many of the weak species like Arctic birds for the sharp increase of its predator. This evidence also tells that the original restriction has already allowed the prosperity of snow geese, since the schedule date is shorten by the hunting season. The long persistence of both the restriction and prosperity of snow geese probably has done nothing to Arctic birds.

The ecologic balance is the center issue in the analysis. The sharp increase of snow geese population may well due to a proportional increase in pray such as Arctic birds. Consequently we do not need to worry about the threatening to Arctic birds. Since the restriction, protecting the snow geese with 5% restriction while cause the hunting season closed earlier for many years, the ecology is well balanced, therefore it is not necessary to drop this restriction to allow the other species to recover.

 

D. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

This has gone far beyond the argument of dropping the restriction; If they colonize to other winter ground the threats to our local Arctic bird would decrease, therefore there is less necessity for us to drop the restriction.
                

5#
发表于 2009-8-3 17:33:00 | 只看该作者
up
6#
发表于 2015-7-16 21:09:52 | 只看该作者
rainsun 发表于 2008-11-30 11:13
我仔细研究了一下,看来这道题所说的restriction是指 hunting season 的时间限制。所以说题里面要取消的限 ...

看了这么多帖,这个解释是唯一make sense的,upup~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-25 18:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部