求助一道有难度的逻辑题

ccjhwk

Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?

(A) The quality of child care will improve.

(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.

(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.

(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond

(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

答案是B，为什么呢？请NN指点一下。

megy666

premise1: since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services,Premise 2:  since such services are socially necessary

Conclusion:government is certain to respond

 government respond: is regulation(which will cost much money)

so B is right

A  D:无关 E等于啥都没说

C陷阱,attractive but not validity , can not conclude from the premise