GWD-23-Q1 和GWD-23-Q10 请前辈们赐教我这样分析选项错误正确的原因对吗

子恕

1.         GWD-23-Q1

A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays
                for special procedures prescribed by physicians only if the procedure is first approved as “medically necessary” by a company-appointed review panel.  The rule is intended to
                save the company the money it might otherwise spend on medically unnecessary procedures.  The company has recently announced that
                    in order to reduce its costs, it will abandon this rule.

Conclusion： to  save  cost It will   abandon this rule

Premise:  to save money ,  appointed  RP  to  review SPP

采取这项措施是为了节省成本，现在取消也是为了节省成本，同一件事情为什么出现了先后不同的措施，这即使矛盾之处，能解释前后采取不同措施的即为正确答案

 

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest justification for the company’s decision?

 

A.       Patients often register dissatisfaction with physicians who prescribe nothing for their ailments. 注意结论取消的rule by ARP  而不是由
                physician 发出的

B.       Physicians often prescribe special procedures that are helpful but not altogether necessary for the health of the patient.
                同上

C.       The review process is expensive and practically always results in approval of the prescribed procedure. 很好的说明了APR expensive 而且
            审查后
                always approval 等于多此一举
            ，浪费钱

D.       The company’s review process does not interfere with the prerogative of physicians, in cases where more than one effective procedure is available, to select the one they personally prefer. 与结论无关

E.        The number of members of the company-appointed review panel who review a given procedure depends on the cost of the procedure. 结论是讲cancel the rule ，没有涉及到ARP 的数目

总结
            注意找出结论，造成结论的原因和实施者，如果选项中有不相干实施者，可以大胆排除（还要继续做题检验这一自我总结是否可行）

 

2.         GWD-23-Q10

When trying to identify new technologies that promise to transform the marketplace,
                market researchers
                survey the managers of those companies that are developing new technologies. Such managers have an enormous stake in succeeding, so they invariably overstate the potential of their new technologies.
                Surprisingly, however, market researchers typically do not survey a new technology’s potential buyers, even though it is the buyers-not the producers-who will ultimately determine a technology’s commercial success.

注意结论：MR not survey B，
                even though B ultimately determine a TCS

解释问
            为什么调查员不调查购买者，他们可是直接决定了
            科技商业的成功？市场调查员也知道这道理，却不调查，需要选出的选项就是能说明
            为什么知道B是决定因数却不调查B

 

Which of the following, if true, best accounts for the typical survey practices among market researchers?

 

1. If a new technology succeeds, the commercial benefits accrue largely to the producers, not to the buyers, of that technology. P 获利
                   不代表
                       P 能决定 CS  不是结论想矛盾的问题

2. People who promote the virtues of a new technology typically fail to consider that the old technology that is currently in use continues to be improved, often substantially 与OT无关

3. Investors are unlikely
                   to invest substantial amounts of capital in a company whose own managers are skeptical about the commercial prospects of a new technology they are developing. 与SA 无关

4. The potential buyers for not-yet-available technologies can seldom be reliably identified. 很好的解释了为什么MR 不调查P-B  因为P-B 很少被认出来

5. The developers of a new technology are generally no better positioned than its potential buyers to gauge how rapidly the new technology can be efficiently mass-produced. 是本题结论的重复阐述而不是解释why

fiona_hq

up

kiddcandy

great example