to beautyup:
我感觉好像A/D/E都只能说明现在的成本高,并不能回答“公司的压榨行为”是否会导致“成本是否继续上升”
here is my two cents:
A. Since the risk to insurers of satellites is spread over relatively few units, insurance premiums are necessarily very high. —>只说明现在的事故造成的成本高,没说公司的措施会不会使以后的成本更高
B. When satellites reach orbit and then fail, the causes of failure are generally impossible to pinpoint with confidence. —>找不到卫星掉下来的原因,所以没有针对性的解决方法,因此卫星成本也不会改变(依然会很高)
C. The greater the performance demands placed on satellites, the more frequently those satellites break down. —>找出原文的循环:压榨越大,掉下来的可能性越大(接着原文的论述:越坏掉,成本越高)
D. Most satellites are produced in such small numbers that no economies of scale can be realized. —>因为生产规模小所以贵,跟压榨后更贵无关
E. Since many satellites are built by unwieldy(笨拙的,不实用的) international consortia(银行团), inefficiencies are inevitable. —>银行低效,势必造成现在的成本高,但跟公司的压榨措施会不会造成以后的成本上升无关
欢迎讨论! |