ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Mice that have been given morphine are very likely to develop blood poisoning because bacteria that normally reside in the intestine typically respond to morphine by migrating into the bloodstream. However, when mice are given both morphine and the new drug naltrexone, blood poisoning is much less frequent, although it does still occur. These results provide support for researchers' prediction that naltrexone will turn out to be toxic to certain types of bacteria.
Which of the following, if discovered to be true, would most seriously weaken the support for the researchers' prediction?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1249|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-29-Q40 一道逻辑 请NN帮帮忙解答~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-11-11 20:25:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-29-Q40 一道逻辑 请NN帮帮忙解答~

 GWD-29-Q40
    
Mice that have been given morphine are very likely to develop blood poisoning because bacteria that normally reside in the intestine typically respond to morphine by migrating into the bloodstream.  However, when mice are given both morphine and the new drug naltrexone, blood poisoning is much less frequent, although it does still occur.  These results provide support for researchers’ prediction that naltrexone will turn out to be toxic to certain types of bacteria.
Which of the following, if discovered to be true, would most seriously weaken the support for the researchers’ prediction?
A.After being administered to mice, naltrexone does not pass from the bloodstream into the intestine.
B.Naltrexone inhibits morphine from triggering the migration of intestinal bacteria into the bloodstream.
C.Mice that have been given naltrexone but not morphine have no greater risk of developing blood poisoning than do mice that have not been given either substance.
D.The increased risk of blood poisoning is not the only harmful effect on mice of being given morphine.
E.Conditions other than the presence of intestinal bacteria in the bloodstream can cause blood poisoning in mice
Conditions other than the presence of intestinal bacteria in the bloodstream can cause blood poisoning in mice
答案是B,我第一次选B第二次选C,觉得C不是更直接驳斥prediction吗?

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-11 21:27:45编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-11-11 21:24:00 | 只看该作者
选B不就是对了么..
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-11-11 21:27:00 | 只看该作者
哦~打错了 第二次选C...
地板
发表于 2008-11-11 21:34:00 | 只看该作者

话说文章中由

 条件1:M能够带来细菌产生血液毒素

 条件2: M和N一起使用时细菌减少

 推断: N能够杀菌

这个推断不充分阿

 因为N可能根本就不能杀菌,它的出现导致细菌出现减少的原因可能仅仅因为它控制了细菌的扩散或者是抑制了细菌的活性

所以B正确

5#
发表于 2008-11-11 21:37:00 | 只看该作者

C选项的出现对于假设的驳斥没有什么

假设的观点是关注在N的出现是怎么导致细菌减少的结果的,C选项就无关了

6#
发表于 2011-6-3 03:14:23 | 只看该作者
原题结论:N能起到杀死某类细菌的作用。

问削弱
B:N并不能杀菌,只是起到防止细菌进入血管的作用。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 21:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部