QWD 25-3

scorpio2rd

3. GWD25-Q3.

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A.      attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
        of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.

B.       mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change

C.      attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects

D.      simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
        of that denial

E.       assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
        necessarily benefit all members of that group.

答案是A

我选B. 看过以前的讨论是在C和A之间...但是我对这个题的理解是...会不会去做LECTURES 的少是因为不可以挣到钱(就是MEL说的) 所以选了B.但是也知道A也挺对的...有那位NN可以帮忙解释一下这种两个人的争论题...思路是如何呀...

scorpio2rd

没人知道吗...自己顶....