新问题：OG151,实在想不通,请NN帮忙！

ppjelly

151.
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

请问此题为什么不选C。虽然我也选了D，因为它与原文非常一致。但是我觉得C也挺对的，除非因为C中的”important research“不等于原文的”important new research“，这是我唯一觉得有问题的地方了。但总觉得我没想到关键点，查过了也没人问此选项，还请NN指教！！

   

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-26 21:16:32编辑过]

没办法1987

我不是nn，试着解释一下

首先，此题是假设

前提：有共同做研究这个目标的科学家被认同为colleagues

结论：当renowned as...，则不再被认为是colleagues

假设，架桥，被renowned as...的科学家没有做研究的共同目标。选d

c说，不做重要实验可以成为popularizer，但成为popularizer不一定没有做重要实验啊，那群做了实验的怎么办呢？