[求助]gwd1-q22

蓝露

GWD-1-Q22:
                    Boldface

City Official:  At City
                    Hospital, uninsured patients tend to have shorter stays and fewer procedures performed than do insured patients, even though insured patients, on average, have slightly less serious medical problems at the time of admission to the hospital than uninsured patients have.  Critics of the hospital have     concluded that the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care.  However, this conclusion is almost certainly false.  Careful investigation has recently shown two things:  insured patients have much longer stays in the hospital than necessary, and they tend to have more procedures performed than are medically necessary.

 

In the city official’s argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

 

1. The first states the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.

2. The first is used to support the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second states that conclusion.

3. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second states the position that the city official’s argument opposes.

4. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

5. The first states the position that the city official’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the city official’s argument.[E]

这道题D为什么不对啊？不就是hospital critics么？

请NN指教~~

蓝露

顶下啊~怎么么人回答呢？

melody2121

这个是由OFFCIAL提出的,所以他所要强调的应该是HOWEVER以后的内容,所以,他的观点是后面的.而前面的是他要反驳的.

D中强调了两个结论,其实结论只有一个.

soyabo

First view是由Critics of the hospital 提出来的啊，个人感觉与“hospital critics”不是一个意思

而且两句的作用肯定也不是前一句支持一个观点，后一句支持另一个观点。这有点废话了

而是一个反对一个肯定。不知道是不是这个原因，等牛牛回答……

elaine1031

up

Raymond_GMAT

 However, this conclusion is almost certainly false. 

I think this sentence is more likely a conclusion than a support.

sasha_wen

不明白顶一下，期待牛牛回帖！
我的理解是这两个黑体都是结论不是论据不能起支持作用，不知道理解得怎样。

crown48

总觉得这两句说的是一个意思啊
1说没保险的没有接到正确治疗（前提是没保险的shorter stay）
2说有保险的longer stay
这不就一样了么。。。
不过E是没问题的，只不过city official的结论感觉就是第二个黑体句子了。。。（没有实质内容啊。。。）
哎，完全懵了。。。呼唤nn

iriszhu

我觉得问题在于第二句话就是conclusion。。。最后一句才是对此的support
official的目的就是说明however前面的结论是错误的呀。。。
D和E前半句个人觉得讲的是一个意思。。。
米有区别呀~oppose不就是critics么

lq0

The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

The first states the position that the city official’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the city official’s argument.[E]


个人认为，第一个boldface是主观的，不能用作support