ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all such crashes. To address this problem, the airlines have upgraded their training programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots' lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes.

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3234|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

支持和假设到底怎么区分

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-14 12:15:00 | 只看该作者

支持和假设到底怎么区分

假设主要以两种方式出现,桥梁型排除他因型排除他因是不是也可以看成支持的答案?

支持:是支持文章结论。

到底怎么样简介的理解两者在选项中的区别,请各位NN出手。。

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-14 16:05:00 | 只看该作者
是问题太难不好回答,还是太简单不削回答(注意有让步,强调后者),马上要考,复习到最后发现又回到原点,是归一还是没有解决根本,关键看大家如何ETS对这两种的思路。求教大N。。。
板凳
发表于 2008-9-14 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

我来试试。

我看成是这样两种题(1)supporter题;(2)defender题,应该分别对应你的桥梁和排除他应题。

首先是读题找出文章中的结论句。

然后看文章中的premise和conclusion之间有没有存在GAP:如果存在GAP,那就是supportor题,如果没有存在GAP那就是defender题。然后分别用各自的方法来解题。

找GAP的方法:两种:(A)conclusion中出现新信息;(B)premise中的重要信息,conclusion中没有。

我这里简单给出两个例子:

A类GAP---OG11第2题,新信息profits;

B类GAP---0G11第81题,重要信息premise中的on Maryland highways.

出现GAP就是第一类supporter题,用常识和根据题中给出的信息“搭桥”

如果没有GAP就是第二类defender题,先对题目取非---然后能够削弱原题结论的选项就是正确答案。

我就是这样做ASSUMPTION题的,发现每一题都能对号入座,大大加快了做题速度。希望对你有帮助。祝你考试成功。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-14 22:58:38编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-14 23:40:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks Dirrrk,  按照你提供的方法我分析了一些题目。。。。请探讨一下这题。。有点疑问。

77. How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all such crashes. To address this problem, the airline have upgraded their training programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes.

 

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?

 

A.        Training programs can eliminate pilot errors.

B.        Commercial pilot routinely undergo additional training throughout their careers.

C.        The number of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing actual flying time.

D.       Lack of actual flying time is an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes.

E.        Communication skills are not important to pilot training programs

FEIFEI的逻辑题,

思路:xxxprogram 不能补充pilots lack of actual flying time.结论:thererfore, rethink approach to prevent commercial plane crash. 中间有思维跳跃,actual flying time plane crash 什么关系?

A.        削弱,program can eliminate, so do not need rethink approach

B.         无关。题中是prevent planes crashestraining.

C.         加强。

D.        actual flying time (pilot error in) plane crashes 联系起来。对assumption取非:actual flying time is not an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes. 削弱结论。符合ETS假设定义。

E.   加强。

C说是加强,我觉得选C也可以。。。。

5#
发表于 2008-9-15 00:13:00 | 只看该作者

应该是C吧

But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes. 这个整句话应该是结论

lack of actual flying time是NEW INFORMATION,与前面的crash就形成了GAP了

C刚好填补这个GAP

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-16 22:29:00 | 只看该作者
答案是D哦~~, FEIFEI --77
7#
发表于 2008-9-16 23:51:00 | 只看该作者

你们说的真深奥

我一直的理解是 假设 就是前提 就是没有这个前提 那题目中的内容就不能存在

支持 是加强 是补充证据 没有它题目也成了 有了它 题目会更站得住脚 加强嘛 顾名思义

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部