ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Simply because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 10599|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教PREP第一套的103题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-18 01:16:00 | 只看该作者

请教PREP第一套的103题

103.
                            
(30029-!-item-!-188;#058&004082)

Simply
                        because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to
become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature.

 

(A) because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to

(B) because it is genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to

(C) being genetically engineered does not make it any more likely that plants will

(D) being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to

(E) being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely that it will become

答案是D, 我怎么也想不明白。讲解上说being 做主语,我就更不明白了。

请高人帮我讲解一下!

谢谢

沙发
发表于 2008-8-18 02:21:00 | 只看该作者
According to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature, simply being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to become an invasive or persistent weed. 这样改写一下楼主能更容易理解,

According to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature,介词短语作状语;  being genetically engineered 做主语; does not make 做谓语; a plant 做宾语 any more likely to become an invasive or persistent weed.做宾语补足语

虽然being的结构GMAC不提倡使用,但这个句子中需要强调被动语态做主语,因此用了being。

According to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature,介词短语作状语;  being genetically engineered 做主语; does not make 做谓语; a plant 做宾语 any more likely to become an invasive or persistent weed.做宾语补足语

虽然being的结构GMAC不提倡使用,但这个句子中需要强调被动语态做主语,因此用了being。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-18 03:06:00 | 只看该作者
十分感谢!!!
地板
发表于 2009-4-26 13:33:00 | 只看该作者
是因为B中because引导的原因状语从句不可以做主语么?
5#
发表于 2009-4-26 13:45:00 | 只看该作者
because引导的原因状语从句不可以做主*句* ;-)
6#
发表于 2009-4-26 13:46:00 | 只看该作者
in short, 所有從句(to be precise, "subordinate clause")都不可以做主句.
7#
发表于 2009-4-26 15:49:00 | 只看该作者

就是"连词+句子"这样的结构不能做句子的主语?eg:because it is genetically engineered
            does not make a plant any more likely to......

8#
发表于 2009-4-27 01:06:00 | 只看该作者
oh, I see your question now...
umm...一般常見的是"That/What/Whoever/etc S+V+O"當主語.
Because S+V+O當主語有點怪, 記憶中好像沒見過...
等NN來confirm
9#
发表于 2009-4-29 08:22:00 | 只看该作者
alright, 被mm攪渾了...其實我巳說了, 看6th floor ;-)
10#
发表于 2009-8-6 15:16:00 | 只看该作者
ding
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 11:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部