ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: bosfashion
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教PREP第一套的103题

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2009-8-7 17:55:00 | 只看该作者
~~
12#
发表于 2009-8-7 17:57:00 | 只看该作者
~~
13#
发表于 2009-8-7 18:29:00 | 只看该作者
that引导的从句和WH-引导的从句可以做主语,这种情况一般可以用it做形式主语,如:
It was said that...和That ... was said是一个意思。
ING分词可以做主语。
这道题Because引导的从句不能做主语,所以AB错误。C的plants和become an invasive不对应,不能说一个复数成为一个单数。E的后面那个become应该是多出来的。如果不多,意思也不对。

14#
发表于 2009-9-1 19:54:00 | 只看该作者
up
15#
发表于 2009-9-23 06:30:00 | 只看该作者
if 'being' were a modifier, then it wouldn't make sense in its current location, as you'll soon see:

this sentence has the following form: X does not make...
therefore, whatever goes in the 'x' slot has to be, or function as, a noun. this rules out a-b immediately (these are subordinate clauses, which can't function as nouns).

in choices c-d-e, the 'being' is a gerund (the -ing form that functions as a noun, as in the sentence taking overdoses of vitamins isn't good for your health). since gerunds function as nouns, that structure is permissible.
16#
发表于 2009-9-23 06:36:00 | 只看该作者

search from the internet for cder comment as follows:


- Usually, I see "That/What/Whoever/etc S+V+O" functions as a subject. Can "Because S+V+O" functions as a subject?

no.

"because" acts like "although", "while", "even though", and so on.
you can't make a subject out of "although s+v+o", nor from any of the others.


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 09:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部