|
以下是引用xinxian在2008-8-17 2:32:00的发言: Neither statement alone is sufficient. With statement 1, (n - 1)(n + 1) can, for example, be 8 or 24, which yield two different remainders when divided by 24. With statement 2, (n - 1)(n + 1) can, for example, be 3 or 15, which yield two different remainders when divided by 24.
Considering the two statements together...
Statement 1 tells us that n is not even; therefore (n - 1) and (n + 1) are both even. And furthermore, because (n - 1) and (n + 1) are two consecutive even numbers, one of them is a multiple of 4. Therefore (n - 1)(n + 1) will be a multiple of 8.
Statement 2 tells us that n is not a multiple of 3; therefore either (n - 1) or (n + 1) must be a multiple of 3. Therefore (n - 1)(n + 1) will be a multiple of 3.
The two statements together, then, tell us that (n - 1)(n + 1) is a multiple of 8*3 = 24. So the remainder when divided by 24 will always be 0. Sufficient. The correct response is C. ....超COOL~~~ 小女子谢过先!!! |