ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Current enrollments in Kravonia's colleges indicate that over the next four years the percentage of the Kravonian workforce with college degrees will increase dramatically. Therefore, the average salary for all workers in Kravonia is likely to increase over the next four years.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2844|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD15 V34 38

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-13 14:24:00 | 只看该作者

GWD15 V34 38


    

Q34:


    

In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs
requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for
jobs that do not require a degree. 
Current enrollments in Kravonia’s colleges indicate that over the next
four years the percentage of the Kravonian workforce with college degrees will
increase dramatically.  Therefore, the
average salary for all workers in Kravonia is likely to increase over the next
four years.


    

 


    

Which of the following is an assumption on
which the argument depends?


    

 


    
  1. Kravonians with more than one college degree earn more, on
         average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree.
  2. The percentage of Kravonians who attend college in order to
         earn higher salaries is higher now than it was several years ago.
  3. The higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree
         is not due largely to a scarcity among the Kravonian workforce of people
         with a college degree.
  4. The average salary in Kravonia for jobs that do not require a
         college degree will not increase over the next four years.
  5. Few members of the Kravonian workforce earned their degrees in
         other countries.


这道题标准答案给的是C 请问怎么理解阿 我觉得D貌似才对么


    

Q38:


    

In one state, all cities and most towns
have antismoking ordinances.  A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking
Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only,
“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”  The petition advocates a state law banning
smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open
to the public.


    

 


    

Which of the following circumstances would
make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the
proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?


    

 


    
  1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance
         premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
  2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail
         establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
  3. The state law would supersede
         the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the
         state law does.
  4. There is considerable sentiment
         among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
  5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances
         banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that
         smoking would constitute a fire hazard.


还有这道答案给的是E 请问怎么理解呢
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-17 19:39:00 | 只看该作者
怎么没人回呢 自己先DD
板凳
发表于 2010-4-11 15:14:50 | 只看该作者
up~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 01:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部