Q34: In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Current enrollments in Kravonia’s colleges indicate that over the next four years the percentage of the Kravonian workforce with college degrees will increase dramatically. Therefore, the average salary for all workers in Kravonia is likely to increase over the next four years. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? - Kravonians with more than one college degree earn more, on
average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree. - The percentage of Kravonians who attend college in order to
earn higher salaries is higher now than it was several years ago. - The higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree
is not due largely to a scarcity among the Kravonian workforce of people with a college degree. - The average salary in Kravonia for jobs that do not require a
college degree will not increase over the next four years. - Few members of the Kravonian workforce earned their degrees in
other countries.
这道题标准答案给的是C 请问怎么理解阿 我觉得D貌似才对么
Q38: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public. Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide? - Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance
premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers. - In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail
establishments and government offices that are open to the public. - The state law would supersede
the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does. - There is considerable sentiment
among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking. - The state law would not affect existing local ordinances
banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
还有这道答案给的是E 请问怎么理解呢
|